The DOI matches its Crossref record; 107 of the 107 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Drought coping strategies in cotton: increased crop per drop
Open accessAbstract
Summary: The growth and yield of many crops, including cotton, are affected by water deficit. Cotton has evolved drought specific as well as general morpho‐physiological, biochemical and molecular responses to drought stress, which are discussed in this review. The key physiological responses against drought stress in cotton, including stomata closing, root development, cellular adaptations, photosynthesis, abscisic acid (ABA) and jasmonic acid (JA) production and reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging, have been identified by researchers. Drought stress induces the expression of stress‐related transcription factors and genes, such as ROS scavenging, ABA or mitogen‐activated protein kinases (MAPK) signalling genes, which activate various drought‐related pathways to induce tolerance in the plant. It is crucial to elucidate and induce drought‐tolerant traits via quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis, transgenic approaches and exogenous application of substances. The current review article highlights the natural as well as engineered drought tolerance strategies in cotton.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
2 retracted
Zhang, F., Li, S., Yang, S., Wang, L., & Guo, W. (2014) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/s11103-014-0260-3 · Cited by 73
RetractedZhang, F., Li, S., Yang, S., Wang, L., & Guo, W. (2018) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/s11103-018-0775-0 · Cited by 12
RetractedReactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants
Gill, S. S., & Tuteja, N. (2010) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016 · Cited by 11,663
Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell.
Chaves, M. M., Flexas, J., & Pinheiro, C. (2009) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcn125 · Cited by 4,181
Das, K., & Roychoudhury, A. (2014) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2014.00053 · Cited by 3,122
Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., & Shinozaki, K. (2006) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105444 · Cited by 2,950
Wasternack, C., & Hause, B. (2013) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mct067 · Cited by 2,629
The JAZ family of repressors is the missing link in jasmonate signalling
Chini, A., Fonseca, S., Fernández, G., Adie, B., Chico, J. M., Lorenzo, O., García-Casado, G., López-Vidriero, I., Lozano, F. M., Ponce, M. R., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06006 · Cited by 2,432
The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change
Hetherington, A. M., & Woodward, F. I. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01843 · Cited by 2,399
Wasternack, C. (2007) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcm079 · Cited by 1,835
Metadata
- Authors
- Ullah, A., Sun, H., Yang, X., & Zhang, X.
- Venue
- Plant Biotechnology Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-02-20
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 271-284
- ISSN
- 1467-7644 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-7652
- OpenAlex
- W2570848410
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 107
- FWCI
- 24.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Drought coping strategies in cotton: increased crop per drop. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/pbi.12688
- The paper
- Ullah, A., Sun, H., Yang, X., & Zhang, X. (2017). Drought coping strategies in cotton: increased crop per drop. Plant Biotechnology Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12688
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
