Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 360

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Simultaneous CRISPR /Cas9‐mediated editing of cassava eIF 4E isoforms nCBP ‐1 and nCBP ‐2 reduces cassava brown streak disease symptom severity and incidence

Open access
Gomez, Michael A., Lin, Z. Daniel, Moll, Theodore, Chauhan, Raj Deepika, Hayden, Luke, Renninger, Kelley, Beyene, Getu, Taylor, Nigel J., Carrington, James C., Staskawicz, Brian J., Bart, Rebecca S.·2019·Plant Biotechnology Journal

Abstract

Summary: Cassava brown streak disease ( CBSD ) is a major constraint on cassava yields in East and Central Africa and threatens production in West Africa. CBSD is caused by two species of positive‐sense RNA viruses belonging to the family Potyviridae , genus Ipomovirus : Cassava brown streak virus ( CBSV ) and Ugandan cassava brown streak virus ( UCBSV ). Diseases caused by the family Potyviridae require the interaction of viral genome‐linked protein ( VP g) and host eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E ( eIF 4E) isoforms. Cassava encodes five eIF 4E proteins: eIF 4E , eIF( iso)4E‐1 , eIF( iso)4E‐2 , novel cap‐binding protein‐1 ( nCBP ‐1), and nCBP ‐2. Protein–protein interaction experiments consistently found that VP g proteins associate with cassava nCBP s. CRISPR /Cas9‐mediated genome editing was employed to generate ncbp‐1, ncbp‐2, and ncbp‐1/ncbp‐2 mutants in cassava cultivar 60444. Challenge with CBSV showed that ncbp‐1/ncbp‐2 mutants displayed delayed and attenuated CBSD aerial symptoms, as well as reduced severity and incidence of storage root necrosis. Suppressed disease symptoms were correlated with reduced virus titre in storage roots relative to wild‐type controls. Our results demonstrate the ability to modify multiple genes simultaneously in cassava to achieve tolerance to CBSD . Future studies will investigate the contribution of remaining eIF 4E isoforms on CBSD and translate this knowledge into an optimized strategy for protecting cassava from disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/pbi.12987

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 360

Metadata

Authors
Gomez, M. A., Lin, Z. D., Moll, T., Chauhan, R. D., Hayden, L., Renninger, K., Beyene, G., Taylor, N. J., Carrington, J. C., Staskawicz, B. J., & Bart, R. S.
Venue
Plant Biotechnology Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-10-05
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
421-434
ISSN
  • 1467-7644 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-7652
OpenAlex
W2951891003
Cited by
360
References
2
FWCI
25.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simultaneous CRISPR /Cas9‐mediated editing of cassava eIF 4E isoforms nCBP ‐1 and nCBP ‐2 reduces cassava brown streak disease symptom severity and incidence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/pbi.12987
The paper
Gomez, M. A., Lin, Z. D., Moll, T., Chauhan, R. D., Hayden, L., Renninger, K., Beyene, G., Taylor, N. J., Carrington, J. C., Staskawicz, B. J., & Bart, R. S. (2019). Simultaneous CRISPR /Cas9‐mediated editing of cassava eIF 4E isoforms nCBP ‐1 and nCBP ‐2 reduces cassava brown streak disease symptom severity and incidence. Plant Biotechnology Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12987

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.