The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Volatiles produced by soil‐borne endophytic bacteria increase plant pathogen resistance and affect tritrophic interactions
Open accessAbstract
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) released by soil microorganisms influence plant growth and pathogen resistance. Yet, very little is known about their influence on herbivores and higher trophic levels. We studied the origin and role of a major bacterial VOC, 2,3‐butanediol (2,3‐BD), on plant growth, pathogen and herbivore resistance, and the attraction of natural enemies in maize. One of the major contributors to 2,3‐BD in the headspace of soil‐grown maize seedlings was identified as E nterobacter aerogenes, an endophytic bacterium that colonizes the plants. The production of 2,3‐BD by E. aerogenes rendered maize plants more resistant against the N orthern corn leaf blight fungus S etosphaeria turcica. On the contrary, E. aerogenes‐inoculated plants were less resistant against the caterpillar S podoptera littoralis. The effect of 2,3‐BD on the attraction of the parasitoid C otesia marginiventris was more variable: 2,3‐BD application to the headspace of the plants had no effect on the parasitoids, but application to the soil increased parasitoid attraction. Furthermore, inoculation of seeds with E. aerogenes decreased plant attractiveness, whereas inoculation of soil with a total extract of soil microbes increased parasitoid attraction, suggesting that the effect of 2,3‐BD on the parasitoid is indirect and depends on the composition of the microbial community.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bacterial Volatiles Induce Systemic Resistance in Arabidopsis
Ryu, C.-M., Farag, M. A., Hu, C.-H., Reddy, M. S., Kloepper, J. W., & Paré, P. W. (2004) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.103.026583 · Cited by 1,308
MARTI, G., ERB, M., BOCCARD, J., GLAUSER, G., DOYEN, G. R., VILLARD, N., ROBERT, C. A. M., TURLINGS, T. C. J., RUDAZ, S., & WOLFENDER, J. (2013) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/pce.12002 · Cited by 183
Self-citation
Cited by
Beneficial effects of microbial volatile organic compounds (MVOCs) in plants
Poveda, J. (2021) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104118 · Cited by 190
Erb, M. (2018) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2018.03.008 · Cited by 155
Self-citationVOCs-mediated hormonal signaling and crosstalk with plant growth promoting microbes
Tyagi, S., Mulla, S. I., Lee, K.-J., Chae, J.-C., & Shukla, P. (2018) · Critical Reviews in Biotechnology · doi:10.1080/07388551.2018.1472551 · Cited by 138
Delaplace, P., Delory, B. M., Baudson, C., Mendaluk-Saunier de Cazenave, M., Spaepen, S., Varin, S., Brostaux, Y., & du Jardin, P. (2015) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/s12870-015-0585-3 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- D'ALESSANDRO, M., ERB, M., TON, J., BRANDENBURG, A., KARLEN, D., ZOPFI, J., & TURLINGS, T. C. J.
- Venue
- Plant, Cell & Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 813-826
- ISSN
- 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3040
- OpenAlex
- W1948619473
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Volatiles produced by soil‐borne endophytic bacteria increase plant pathogen resistance and affect tritrophic interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/pce.12220
- The paper
- D'ALESSANDRO, M., ERB, M., TON, J., BRANDENBURG, A., KARLEN, D., ZOPFI, J., & TURLINGS, T. C. J. (2014). Volatiles produced by soil‐borne endophytic bacteria increase plant pathogen resistance and affect tritrophic interactions. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12220
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.