The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A meta‐analysis on growth, physiological, and biochemical responses of woody species to ground‐level ozone highlights the role of plant functional types
Open accessAbstract
The carbon‐sink strength of temperate and boreal forests at midlatitudes of the northern hemisphere is decreased by ozone pollution, but knowledge on subtropical evergreen broadleaved forests is missing. Taking the dataset from Chinese studies covering temperate and subtropical regions, effects of elevated ozone concentration ([O 3]) on growth, biomass, and functional leaf traits of different types of woody plants were quantitatively evaluated by meta‐analysis. Elevated mean [O 3] of 116 ppb reduced total biomass of woody plants by 14% compared with control (mean [O 3] of 21 ppb). Temperate species from China were more sensitive to O 3 than those from Europe and North America in terms of photosynthesis and transpiration. Significant reductions in chlorophyll content, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, and ascorbate peroxidase induced significant injury to photosynthesis and growth (height and diameter). Importantly, subtropical species were significantly less sensitive to O 3 than temperate ones, whereas deciduous broadleaf species were significantly more sensitive than evergreen broadleaf and needle‐leaf species. These findings suggest that carbon‐sink strength of Chinese forests is reduced by present and future [O 3] relative to control (20–40 ppb). Given that (sub)‐tropical evergreen broadleaved species dominate in Chinese forests, estimation of the global carbon‐sink constraints due to [O 3] should be re‐evaluated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B., & Kent, J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35002501 · Cited by 31,710
China’s environment in a globalizing world
Liu, J., & Diamond, J. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/4351179a · Cited by 1,643
Indirect radiative forcing of climate change through ozone effects on the land-carbon sink
Sitch, S., Cox, P. M., Collins, W. J., & Huntingford, C. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06059 · Cited by 1,019
Cited by
Lefohn, A. S., Malley, C. S., Smith, L., Wells, B., Hazucha, M., Simon, H., Naik, V., Mills, G., Schultz, M. G., Paoletti, E., et al. (2018) · Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene · doi:10.1525/elementa.279 · Cited by 457
Self-citationAgathokleous, E., Feng, Z., Oksanen, E., Sicard, P., Wang, Q., Saitanis, C. J., Araminiene, V., Blande, J. D., Hayes, F., Calatayud, V., et al. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abc1176 · Cited by 382
Self-citationFeng, Z., De Marco, A., Anav, A., Gualtieri, M., Sicard, P., Tian, H., Fornasier, F., Tao, F., Guo, A., & Paoletti, E. (2019) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.104966 · Cited by 361
Self-citationWilson, S. R., Madronich, S., Longstreth, J. D., & Solomon, K. R. (2019) · Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences · doi:10.1039/c8pp90064g · Cited by 68
Li, C., Gu, X., Wu, Z., Qin, T., Guo, L., Wang, T., Zhang, L., & Jiang, G. (2021) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111644 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, P., Feng, Z., Catalayud, V., Yuan, X., Xu, Y., & Paoletti, E.
- Venue
- Plant, Cell & Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-08-30
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2369-2380
- ISSN
- 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3040
- OpenAlex
- W2736471136
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A meta‐analysis on growth, physiological, and biochemical responses of woody species to ground‐level ozone highlights the role of plant functional types. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/pce.13043
- The paper
- Li, P., Feng, Z., Catalayud, V., Yuan, X., Xu, Y., & Paoletti, E. (2017). A meta‐analysis on growth, physiological, and biochemical responses of woody species to ground‐level ozone highlights the role of plant functional types. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13043
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.