Cited by 9Syphilis Diagnosis and TreatmentHistorical Medical Research and TreatmentsReproductive tract infections research

Gaps in the elimination of congenital syphilis in a tertiary care center in Thailand

Anugulruengkitt, Suvaporn, Yodkitudomying, Chatnapa, Sirisabya, Anongnart, Chitsinchayakul, Thaninee, Jantarabenjakul, Watsamon, Chaithongwongwatthana, Surasith, Puthanakit, Thanyawee·2020·Pediatrics International

Abstract

Background The World Health Organization has set a goal to eliminate mother-to-child transmission of syphilis to a target of Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted in a tertiary care center in Bangkok, Thailand. The study included all pregnant women with positive syphilis serology and their infants. All congenital syphilis cases were categorized according to Centers for Disease Control criteria. Results From 2013 to 2017, 69 syphilis-infected pregnant women were included, with 30 congenital syphilis cases. The rate of congenital syphilis was 115 cases (95% CI 78-164) per 100 000 live births. The median (interquartile range) maternal age was 21 (18-32) years and 12 (17%) women had human immunodeficiency virus co-infection. Regarding maternal treatment, 28 (41%) women had inadequate treatment due to 13 cases (19%) of late or no antenatal care, six cases (8%) of recent infection near delivery, five cases (7%) of failure of treatment provision, and four (6%) others. There were three syphilitic stillbirths who were prematurely born to untreated pregnant women and 67 live births (one set of twins) of which 27 met definitions of probable congenital syphilis. They received complete treatment with penicillin and had non-reactive rapid plasma reagin within the first 6 months of life, with the exception of one who had non-reactive rapid plasma reagin at the age of 7 months. Conclusions Congenital syphilis remains a problem in our setting. Nearly half of pregnant women who ha…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ped.14132

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anugulruengkitt, S., Yodkitudomying, C., Sirisabya, A., Chitsinchayakul, T., Jantarabenjakul, W., Chaithongwongwatthana, S., & Puthanakit, T.
Affiliations
  • Chulalongkorn University (TH)
  • Center of Excellence for Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Vaccines Chulalongkorn Bangkok Thailand
Corresponding author
Anugulruengkitt, Suvaporn
Venue
Pediatrics International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-03
Volume
62
Issue
3
Pages
330-336
ISSN
  • 1328-8067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1442-200X
OpenAlex
W2997978841
Cited by
9
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pediatrics International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Historical Medical Research and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
Keywords
congenital syphilis, mother-to-child transmission, maternal syphilis, prenatal care, treatment gap, HIV coinfection, penicillin therapy, RPR, stillbirth, Thailand
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Penicillins, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious, Pregnancy Outcome, Prenatal Care, Retrospective Studies, Syphilis, Syphilis, Congenital, Thailand, Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical, Young Adult, Tertiary Care Centers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review