UV Signature Mutations
Open accessAbstract
Sequencing complete tumor genomes and exomes has sparked the cancer field's interest in mutation signatures for identifying the tumor's carcinogen. This review and meta‐analysis discusses signatures and their proper use. We first distinguish between a mutagen's canonical mutations —deviations from a random distribution of base changes to create a pattern typical of that mutagen—and the subset of signature mutations , which are unique to that mutagen and permit inference backward from mutations to mutagen. To verify UV signature mutations, we assembled literature datasets on cells exposed to UVC , UVB , UVA , or solar simulator light ( SSL ) and tested canonical UV mutation features as criteria for clustering datasets. A confirmed UV signature was: ≥60% of mutations are C→T at a dipyrimidine site, with ≥5% CC → TT . Other canonical features such as a bias for mutations on the nontranscribed strand or at the 3′ pyrimidine had limited application. The most robust classifier combined these features with criteria for the rarity of non‐ UV canonical mutations. In addition, several signatures proposed for specific UV wavelengths were limited to specific genes or species; UV's nonsignature mutations may cause melanoma BRAF mutations; and the mutagen for sunlight‐related skin neoplasms may vary between continents.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most mutations in human melanomas show the UV signature of C→T substitutions at adjacent pyrimidines.
“Yet melanin's ROS generating properties do not explain its role in melanoma development because most mutations in human melanomas display the UV signature of C →T substitutions at sites of adjacent pyrimidines (8, 9).”
From Chemiexcitation of melanin derivatives induces DNA photoproducts long after UV exposure (2015) · cites this paper as [8]
The Introduction and “Canonical Mutations vs Signature Mutations” section report a preponderance of UV-signature mutations in melanomas from sun-exposed body sites. The claim omits that restriction and extends the finding to human melanomas generally. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe gene coding for p53 is the most frequently mutated gene in skin cancer.
“Moreover, gene coding for p53 is the most frequently mutated gene in skin cancer [ 10 ].”
From Faster DNA Repair of Ultraviolet-Induced Cyclobutane Pyrimidine Dimers and Lower Sensitivity to Apoptosis in Human Corneal Epithelial Cells than in Epidermal Keratinocytes (2016) · cites this paper as [10]
The Introduction (page unavailable) reports p53 mutations in squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma. It does not establish that p53 is the most frequently mutated gene across skin cancers; the comparative ranking is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 109 · Cited by 401
- Authors
- Brash, D. E.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Brash, Douglas E.
- ORCID
- Brash, Douglas E.
- Venue
- Photochemistry and Photobiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-11-28
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-26
- ISSN
- 0031-8655 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-1097
- PMC
- PMC4294947
- OpenAlex
- W2032320097
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 109
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 2.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Photochemistry and Photobiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5P50CA121974)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
- Keywords
- UV mutagenesis, mutational signatures, UV-C, UV-B radiation, UVA, skin cancer, carcinogen identification
- MeSH terms
- Mutagens, Mutation, Ultraviolet Rays
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review