Cited by 401Cancer Genomics and DiagnosticsCarcinogens and Genotoxicity AssessmentSkin Protection and Aging

UV Signature Mutations

Open access
Brash, Douglas E.·2015·Photochemistry and Photobiology

Abstract

Sequencing complete tumor genomes and exomes has sparked the cancer field's interest in mutation signatures for identifying the tumor's carcinogen. This review and meta‐analysis discusses signatures and their proper use. We first distinguish between a mutagen's canonical mutations —deviations from a random distribution of base changes to create a pattern typical of that mutagen—and the subset of signature mutations , which are unique to that mutagen and permit inference backward from mutations to mutagen. To verify UV signature mutations, we assembled literature datasets on cells exposed to UVC , UVB , UVA , or solar simulator light ( SSL ) and tested canonical UV mutation features as criteria for clustering datasets. A confirmed UV signature was: ≥60% of mutations are C→T at a dipyrimidine site, with ≥5% CC → TT . Other canonical features such as a bias for mutations on the nontranscribed strand or at the 3′ pyrimidine had limited application. The most robust classifier combined these features with criteria for the rarity of non‐ UV canonical mutations. In addition, several signatures proposed for specific UV wavelengths were limited to specific genes or species; UV's nonsignature mutations may cause melanoma BRAF mutations; and the mutagen for sunlight‐related skin neoplasms may vary between continents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/php.12377

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most mutations in human melanomas show the UV signature of C→T substitutions at adjacent pyrimidines.

    “Yet melanin's ROS generating properties do not explain its role in melanoma development because most mutations in human melanomas display the UV signature of C →T substitutions at sites of adjacent pyrimidines (8, 9).”

    From Chemiexcitation of melanin derivatives induces DNA photoproducts long after UV exposure (2015) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Introduction and “Canonical Mutations vs Signature Mutations” section report a preponderance of UV-signature mutations in melanomas from sun-exposed body sites. The claim omits that restriction and extends the finding to human melanomas generally. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The gene coding for p53 is the most frequently mutated gene in skin cancer.

    “Moreover, gene coding for p53 is the most frequently mutated gene in skin cancer [ 10 ].”

    From Faster DNA Repair of Ultraviolet-Induced Cyclobutane Pyrimidine Dimers and Lower Sensitivity to Apoptosis in Human Corneal Epithelial Cells than in Epidermal Keratinocytes (2016) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) reports p53 mutations in squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma. It does not establish that p53 is the most frequently mutated gene across skin cancers; the comparative ranking is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 109 · Cited by 401

Authors
Brash, D. E.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Brash, Douglas E.
Venue
Photochemistry and Photobiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-11-28
Volume
91
Issue
1
Pages
15-26
ISSN
  • 0031-8655 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-1097
OpenAlex
W2032320097
Cited by
401
References
109
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Photochemistry and Photobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (5P50CA121974)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
Keywords
UV mutagenesis, mutational signatures, UV-C, UV-B radiation, UVA, skin cancer, carcinogen identification
MeSH terms
Mutagens, Mutation, Ultraviolet Rays

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review