Cited by 57Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationComputational and Text Analysis MethodsCultural Differences and Values

Liberal and conservative values: what we can learn from congressional tweets

Jones, Kevin L., Noorbaloochi, Sharareh, Jost, John T., Bonneau, Richard, Nagler, Jonathan, Tucker, Joshua A.·2018·Political Psychology

Abstract

Past research using self‐report questionnaires administered to ordinary citizens demonstrates that value priorities differ as a function of one's political ideology, but it is unclear whether this conclusion applies to political elites, who are presumably seeking to appeal to very broad constituencies. We used quantitative methods of textual analysis to investigate value‐laden language in a collection of 577,555 messages sent from the public Twitter accounts of over 400 members of the U.S. Congress between 2012 and 2014. Consistent with theoretical expectations, we observed that Republican and conservative legislators stressed values of tradition, conformity, and national security (as well as self‐direction), whereas Democratic and liberal legislators stressed values of benevolence, universalism, hedonism, and social/economic security (as well as achievement). Implications for the large‐scale observational study of political psychology are explored.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/pops.12415

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Political conservatives traditionally uphold values that support stereotypical gender roles, while liberals tend to endorse universalistic and egalitarian values.

    “While political conservatives traditionally uphold values that support stereotypical gender roles, liberals tend to endorse universalistic and egalitarian values (Jones et al., 2018).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, K. L., Noorbaloochi, S., Jost, J. T., Bonneau, R., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Jost, John T.
Venue
Political Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-03-29
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
423-443
ISSN
  • 0162-895X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9221
OpenAlex
W2598883057
Cited by
57
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3
FWCI
21.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Political Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (SES‐1248077, SES‐1248077‐001)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
political values, value priorities, political ideology, value-laden language, political elites, self-direction, universalism, conformity, achievement, hedonism, benevolence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review