Liberal and conservative values: what we can learn from congressional tweets
Abstract
Past research using self‐report questionnaires administered to ordinary citizens demonstrates that value priorities differ as a function of one's political ideology, but it is unclear whether this conclusion applies to political elites, who are presumably seeking to appeal to very broad constituencies. We used quantitative methods of textual analysis to investigate value‐laden language in a collection of 577,555 messages sent from the public Twitter accounts of over 400 members of the U.S. Congress between 2012 and 2014. Consistent with theoretical expectations, we observed that Republican and conservative legislators stressed values of tradition, conformity, and national security (as well as self‐direction), whereas Democratic and liberal legislators stressed values of benevolence, universalism, hedonism, and social/economic security (as well as achievement). Implications for the large‐scale observational study of political psychology are explored.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Political conservatives traditionally uphold values that support stereotypical gender roles, while liberals tend to endorse universalistic and egalitarian values.
“While political conservatives traditionally uphold values that support stereotypical gender roles, liberals tend to endorse universalistic and egalitarian values (Jones et al., 2018).”
From What affects people’s use of and attitudes toward gender-inclusive language? A literature review (2025) · cites this paper as Jones et al., 2018
Cites
The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods
Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x09351676 · Cited by 5,774 · see citing works
Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 · Cited by 4,904 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Consistent with the notion that leftists prioritize equality over tradition, whereas rightists prioritize tradition over equality (Jost et al., 2003, 2009, 2016), large-scale surveys conducted throughout North America and Western Europe demonstrate that a leftist orientation is typically associated…”
BackgroundSelf-citationAn overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values
Schwartz, S. H. (2012) · Online Readings in Psychology and Culture · doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1116 · Cited by 4,147 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What affects people’s use of and attitudes toward gender-inclusive language? A literature review
Lange, E., & von Stockhausen, L. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1657753 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jones, K. L., Noorbaloochi, S., Jost, J. T., Bonneau, R., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. A.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- New York University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jost, John T.
- Venue
- Political Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-03-29
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 423-443
- ISSN
- 0162-895X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9221
- OpenAlex
- W2598883057
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 21.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Political Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (SES‐1248077, SES‐1248077‐001)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Keywords
- political values, value priorities, political ideology, value-laden language, political elites, self-direction, universalism, conformity, achievement, hedonism, benevolence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review