The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does smoking during pregnancy mediate educational disparities in preterm delivery? Findings from three large birth cohorts
Abstract
Background: Socio‐economic disparities in preterm delivery have often been attributed to socially patterned smoking habits. However, most existing studies have used methods that potentially give biased estimates of the mediating effect of smoking. We used a contemporary mediation approach to study to which extent smoking during pregnancy mediates educational disparities in preterm delivery. Methods: We performed a comparative analysis of data from three large birth cohort studies: the Danish National Birth Cohort (DNBC), the Dutch Generation R Study, and the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa). Risk of preterm delivery by maternal education is reported as risk differences and decomposed into a part explained by smoking and a part explained by other pathways. Results: Proportions of preterm singleton deliveries were 4.8%‐4.9% in all three cohorts. Total effects of maternal education were 2.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4, 2.5), 3.2 (95% CI 0.8, 5.2) and 2.0 (95% CI 0.9, 3.0) excess preterm deliveries per 100 singleton deliveries in DNBC, Generation R and MoBa when comparing primary/lower secondary education to an academic degree or equivalent. Smoking mediated, respectively, 22%, 10% and 19% of the excess risk in the DNBC, Generation R and MoBa cohorts. Adjustment for potential misclassification of smoking only increased mediated proportions slightly. Conclusions: Smoking during pregnancy explains part of educational disparities in preterm delivery, but the mediated proportion depends on the educational gradient in smoking, emphasising that educational disparities in preterm birth may be mediated by different risk factors in different countries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Only one study provided the CI for the proportion eliminated [33].”
From Mediators of socioeconomic inequalities in preterm birth: a systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [33]
In the citing paper
“only six studies assessed exposure-mediator interaction”
From Mediators of socioeconomic inequalities in preterm birth: a systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [33]
In the citing paper
“only two considered causal assumptions”
From Mediators of socioeconomic inequalities in preterm birth: a systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [33]
In the citing paper
“Difference-of-coefficients between models was the most common mediation analysis approach”
From Mediators of socioeconomic inequalities in preterm birth: a systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [33]
In the citing paper
“Only one of the studies using the difference method estimated the statistical significance of the mediating effect, using bootstrapping to estimate CI [33].”
From Mediators of socioeconomic inequalities in preterm birth: a systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [33]
6 more claims about this paper
Create a free account to see every claim other papers make about this one.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cnattingius, S. (2004) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1080/14622200410001669187 · Cited by 1,126
Mediation analysis with multiple mediators
VanderWeele, T., & Vansteelandt, S. (2014) · Epidemiologic Methods · doi:10.1515/em-2012-0010 · Cited by 858
The Generation R Study: Design and cohort update 2012
Jaddoe, V. W. V., van Duijn, C. M., Franco, O. H., van der Heijden, A. J., van IIzendoorn, M. H., de Jongste, J. C., van der Lugt, A., Mackenbach, J. P., Moll, H. A., Raat, H., et al. (2012) · European Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s10654-012-9735-1 · Cited by 546
Shah, N. R., & Bracken, M. B. (2000) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(00)70240-7 · Cited by 394
Behavioral Influences on Preterm Birth: A Review
Savitz, D. A., & Murnane, P. (2010) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ede.0b013e3181d3ca63 · Cited by 97
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.05.012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/ppe.12185 · DOI
- 10.1093/ije/dyn112 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0037002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0023163 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01582.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00845.x · DOI
- 10.1136/adc.2007.136945 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/eurpub/ckr089 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/jech.57.8.606 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/ije/31.1.163 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/14034948010290040201 · DOI
- 10.1093/ije/dyl170 · DOI
- 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00386-X · DOI
- 10.1080/14622200802238944 · DOI
- 10.1093/aje/kwm223 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/01.ede.0000208475.99429.2d · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/aje/kwv059 · DOI
- 10.4310/SII.2009.v2.n4.a7 · DOI
- Glymour MM, 2006, Methods in Social Epidemiology, 393
- 10.1093/aje/kwj275 · DOI
- 10.1002/sim.3971 · DOI
- 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31824570bd · DOI
- Lumley J, 2009, Interventions for promoting smoking cessation during pregnancy, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD001055
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60082-9 · DOI
- 10.1136/jech-2015-205779 · DOI
Cited by
Mediators of socioeconomic inequalities in preterm birth: a systematic review
McHale, P., Maudsley, G., Pennington, A., Schlüter, D. K., Barr, B., Paranjothy, S., & Taylor-Robinson, D. (2022) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-022-13438-9 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Poulsen, G., Andersen, A. N., Jaddoe, V. W. V., Magnus, P., Raat, H., Stoltenberg, C., Osler, M., & Mortensen, L. H.
- Venue
- Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 164-171
- ISSN
- 0269-5022
- 1365-3016
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 5
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.