Sclerified Cork Outperforms the Exodermis: Root Water Permeability Decreases in the Soil‐To‐Canopy Transition of the Aroid Vine Epipremnum aureum
Open accessAbstract
The aroid vine Epipremnum aureum undergoes changes in habitat and growth axis direction from terrestrial (plagiotropic) to canopy (orthotropic) conditions. Since aerial roots connected to the forest soil are vital for water and nutrient uptake in these vines, we hypothesize that morphophysiological acclimation occurs, enabling root survival under atmospheric conditions. Root morpho‐anatomy, water balance, water absorption assayed via fluorescent tracer, and photochemical activity measured by chlorophyll fluorescence were analyzed. Gentle mechanical abrasion was applied to remove root coverings and compare water retention capacity in intact versus abraded roots. During the soil‐to‐canopy transitions, the root surface shifted from smooth, light brown in terrestrial roots to rough, dark brown surface in aerial roots, a change resulting from exodermis replacement by a sclerified cork in aerial regions. Small host‐contacting regions of aerial roots retained exodermis and epidermal hairs instead of developing a cork, establishing spatial–dimorphism. Intact aerial roots with sclerified cork presented lower water‐loss permeance than terrestrial roots with exodermis; this difference disappeared after abrasion, confirming the functional role of tissue replacement. Optical and fluorescence microscopy identified a ligno‐suberized nature for the covering tissues, differing in structure and size between host‐contact versus atmospheric regions of the aerial roots. While water absorption through root hairs was confirmed in host‐contact, chlorophyll fluorescence suggests minimal photosynthetic capacity in atmospheric region. We propose that exodermis replacement by a sclerified cork is induced by steeper water potential gradients under atmospheric conditions. This anatomical novelty mitigates water loss in aerial roots, enabling E. aureum to thrive in the canopy habitat.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 70 · Cited by 1
- Authors
- Mantovani, A., & Groba, Y. C.
- Affiliations
- Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Mantovani, André
- ORCID
- Mantovani, André
- Venue
- Physiologia Plantarum
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2026-03
- Volume
- 178
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e70779-e70779
- ISSN
- 0031-9317 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-3054
- PMC
- PMC13000685
- OpenAlex
- W7138934302
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 3.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Physiologia Plantarum (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant responses to water stress
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Surface Properties and Treatments
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
- Keywords
- Epipremnum aureum, aerial roots, exodermis, water loss, root water uptake, photosynthetic capacity, water potential gradient
- MeSH terms
- Chlorophyll, Permeability, Soil, Water, Plant Leaves, Plant Roots
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review