The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Clinical concepts for regenerative therapy in intrabony defects
Abstract
Evidence indicates that periodontal regeneration is an efficacious and predictable procedure for the treatment of isolated and multiple intrabony defects. Meta‐analyses from systematic reviews indicate an added benefit, in terms of clinical attachment level gain, when demineralized freeze‐dried bone allograft, barrier membranes and active biologic products/compounds are applied in addition to open flap debridement. On the other hand, a consistent amount of variability of the outcomes is evident among different studies and within the experimental population of each study. This variability is explained, at least in part, by different patient and defect characteristics. Patient‐related factors include smoking habit, compliance with home oral hygiene and residual inflammation after cause‐related therapy. Defect‐associated factors include defect depth and radiographic angle, the number of residual bony walls, pocket depth and the degree of hypermobility. In addition, surgical‐related variables, such as surgical skill, clinical experience and knowledge, and application of the different regenerative materials, have a significant impact on clinical outcomes. This paper presents a strategy to optimize the clinical outcomes of periodontal regeneration. The surgical design of the flap, the use of different regenerative materials and the application of appropriate passive sutures are discussed in this review along with the scientific foundations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Periodontitis: facts, fallacies and the future
Slots, J. (2017) · Periodontology 2000 · doi:10.1111/prd.12221 · Cited by 1,153
Nonsurgical and surgical treatment of periodontitis: how many options for one disease?
Graziani, F., Karapetsa, D., Alonso, B., & Herrera, D. (2017) · Periodontology 2000 · doi:10.1111/prd.12201 · Cited by 566
Regenerative Medicine for Periodontal and Peri-implant Diseases
Larsson, L., Decker, A. M., Nibali, L., Pilipchuk, S. P., Berglundh, T., & Giannobile, W. V. (2016) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/0022034515618887 · Cited by 300
Nibali, L., Koidou, V. P., Nieri, M., Barbato, L., Pagliaro, U., & Cairo, F. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/jcpe.13237 · Cited by 253
Orthodontic treatment of patients with severe (stage IV) periodontitis
Papageorgiou, S. N., Antonoglou, G. N., Eliades, T., Martin, C., & Sanz, M. (2024) · Seminars in Orthodontics · doi:10.1053/j.sodo.2024.01.004 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Cortellini, P., & Tonetti, M. S.
- Venue
- Periodontology 2000
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-04-13
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 282-307
- ISSN
- 0906-6713 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0757
- OpenAlex
- W2089998635
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical concepts for regenerative therapy in intrabony defects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/prd.12048
- The paper
- Cortellini, P., & Tonetti, M. S. (2015). Clinical concepts for regenerative therapy in intrabony defects. Periodontology 2000. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12048
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.