Cited by 691Public Policy and Administration ResearchPolitical Systems and GovernanceLocal Government Finance and Decentralization

The Institutional Collective Action Framework

Open access
Feiock, Richard C.·2013·Policy Studies Journal

Abstract

I nstitutional collective action ( ICA ) dilemmas arise from the division or partitioning of authority in which decisions by one government in one or more specific functional area impacts other governments and/or other functions. The focus on externalities of choice in fragmented systems integrates multiple research traditions into a conceptual system to understand and investigate collective dilemmas ubiquitous in contemporary governance arrangements. The mechanisms for mitigating ICA dilemmas are classified according to their scope and enforcement. Incentives to participate in a mechanism are hypothesized to favor mechanisms that provide the greatest gain for the least cost under different conditions of collaboration risk as determined by the nature of the underlying ICA problem, the compositions of affected jurisdictions, and institutional contexts. After reviewing empirical applications of the framework, an agenda to advance the theoretical and empirical development of the ICA approach is advanced.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/psj.12023

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feiock, R. C.
Corresponding author
Feiock, Richard C.
Venue
Policy Studies Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-08
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
397-425
ISSN
  • 0190-292X (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0072
OpenAlex
W1552709038
Cited by
691
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 7
FWCI
93.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Policy Studies Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Systems and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Local Government Finance and Decentralization
Keywords
institutional collective action, collective action problems, intergovernmental relations, governance arrangements, participation incentives, enforcement mechanisms, interjurisdictional collaboration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review