Shifting Administrative Burden to the State: The Case of Medicaid Take‐Up
Abstract
Administrative burden is an individual's experience of policy implementation as onerous. Such burdens may be created because of a desire to limit payments to ineligible claimants, but they also serve to limit take‐up of benefits by eligible claimants. For citizens, this burden may occur through learning about a program; complying with rules and discretionary bureaucratic behavior to participate; and the psychological costs of participating in an unpopular program. Using a mixed‐method approach, the authors explain process changes that reduced individual burden and demonstrate how this resulted in increased take‐up in Medicaid in the state of Wisconsin. The findings inform the planned expansion of Medicaid under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. A key design principle for Medicaid and other means‐tested programs is that it is possible to increase program take‐up while maintaining program integrity by shifting administrative burdens from the citizen to the state .
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Auto-enrollment provides a powerful way to level the playing field for those who struggle with administrative barriers.
“The technique of auto‐enrollment—in which the state uses administrative data to identify and enroll eligible individuals—provides a powerful way to level the playing field for those who struggle with administrative barriers (Herd et al. 2013).”
From Human Capital and Administrative Burden: The Role of Cognitive Resources in Citizen‐State Interactions (2020) · cites this paper as Herd et al. 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 263
- Authors
- Herd, P., DeLeire, T., Harvey, H., & Moynihan, D. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Georgetown University (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- Public Administration Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-08-20
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- s1
- ISSN
- 0033-3352 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6210
- OpenAlex
- W2156368456
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 39 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 13.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Public Administration Review (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
- University of Wisconsin-Madison
- Wisconsin Department of Health Services
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
- Keywords
- administrative burden, means-tested benefits, program integrity, Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion, administrative discretion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review