Cited by 96E-Government and Public ServicesPublic Policy and Administration ResearchPublic Administration in Developing Nations

Serving Clients When the Server Crashes: How Frontline Workers Cope with E‐Government Challenges

Open access
Tummers, Lars, Rocco, Philip·2015·Public Administration Review

Abstract

Implementing e‐government in the contemporary American state is challenging. E‐government places high technical demands on agencies and citizens in an environment of budget austerity and political polarization. Governments developing e‐government policies often mobilize frontline workers—also termed “street‐level bureaucrats”—to help citizens gain access to services. However, we know little about how frontline workers cope in these challenging circumstances. This article fills this gap by examining frontline workers implementing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Based on a qualitative analysis, the authors find that frontline workers “move toward clients” when coping with stress: they bend the rules, work overtime, and collaborate in order to help clients. They are less inclined to “move away” or “move against” clients, for instance, through rigid rule following and rationing. In other words, frontline workers try to serve clients, even “when the server crashes.” Frontline workers, then, can play a vital role in the successful implementation of e‐government policies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/puar.12379

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 96

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Adcock, Robert and David Collier. 2001. Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research. American Political Science Review 95(3): 529-546.
  2. Anagnostopoulos, Dorothea. 2003. The New Accountability, Student Failure, and Teachers' Work in Urban High Schools. Educational Policy 17(3): 291-316.
  3. A Job Demands-Resources Approach to Public Service Motivation. Public Administration Review.
  4. Béland, Daniel, Philip Rocco, and Alex Waddan. 2014a. Implementing Health Care Reform in the United States: Intergovernmental Politics and the Dilemmas of Institutional Design. Health Policy 116(1): 51-60.
  5. Béland, Daniel, Philip Rocco, and Alex Waddan. 2014b. Obamacare, Universal Credit, and the Trilemma of Public Services. Public Administration Review 74(2): 142-143.
  6. Brodkin, Evelyn Z. 2011. Policy Work: Street-Level Organizations Under New Managerialism. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 21(suppl_2): i253-i277.
  7. Buffat, Aurélien. 2015. Street-Level Bureaucracy and E-Government. Public Management Review 17(1): 149-161.
  8. Darnell, Julie, S. 2013. Navigators and Assisters: Two Case Management Roles for Social Workers in the Affordable Care Act. Health & Social Work 38(2): 123-126.
  9. DeHart-Davis, Leisha. 2007. The Unbureaucratic Personality. Public Administration Review 67(5): 892-903
  10. Delfgaauw, Josse, and Robert Dur. 2008. Incentives and Workers' Motivation in the Public Sector. Economic Journal 118(525): 171-191.
  11. Dewe, Philip J., Michael P. O'Driscoll, and Cary L. Cooper. 2010. Coping with Work Stress: A Review and Critique. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
  12. Dias, Janice J., & Maynard-Moody, Steven 2007. For-Profit Welfare: Contracts, Conflicts, and the Performance Paradox. Journal Of Public Administration Research & Theory 17(2): 189-211.
  13. Dunleavy, Patrick, Margetts, Helen, Bastow, Simon, & Tinkler, Jane. 2006. Digital Era Governance: IT Corporations, the State, and E-Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  14. Dybdal, Kristin, Lynn A. Blewett, Jessie Kemmick Pintor, and Kelli Johnson. 2015. Putting Out the Welcome Mat-Targeting Outreach Efforts Under the Affordable Care Act: Evidence From the Minnesota Community Application Agent Program. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice 21(1): 51-58.*
  15. Evans, Tony. 2013. Organizational Rules and Discretion in Adult Social Work. British Journal of Social Work 43(4): 739-758.
  16. Feiock, Richard C., and Hee Soun Jang. 2009. Nonprofits as Local Government Service Contractors. Public Administration Review 69(4): 668-680.
  17. Grant, Adam M. (2008). Employees Without a Cause: The Motivational Effects of Prosocial Impact in Public Service. International Public Management Journal 11(1): 48-66.
  18. Grønbjerg, Kirsten. 2014. Introduction to Virtual Issue: Nonprofit Organizations. Public Administration Review. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/%28ISSN%291540- 6210/homepage/virtual_issue__nonprofit_organizations.htm#introduction [accessed December 30, 2014]. · DOI
  19. Haeder, Simon F., and David L. Weimer. 2013. You Can't Make Me Do It: State Implementation of Insurance Exchanges under the Affordable Care Act. Public Administration Review 73: S34-S47.
  20. Henderson, Alexander. 2013. Examining Policy Implementation in Health Care: Rule Abidance and Deviation in Emergency Medical Services. Public Administration Review 73(6): 799-809.
  21. Laffont, Jean-Jacques, and David Martimort. 2009. The Theory of Incentives: the Principal- Agent Model. New Haven: Princeton University Press.
  22. Lazarus, Richard. 1966. Psychological Stress and the Coping Process. New York: McGraw- Hill.
  23. Lipsky, Michael. 2010. Street-Level Bureaucracy (30-Year Anniversary Edition). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  24. Marwell, Nicole P. 2004. Privatizing the Welfare State: Nonprofit Community-Based Organizations as Political Actors. American Sociological Review 69(2): 265-291.
  25. Maynard-Moody, Steven and Michael Musheno (2012). Social Equities and Inequities in Practice: Street-Level Workers as Agents and Pragmatists. Public Administration Review 72: S16-S23.
  26. Maynard-Moody, Steven and Michael Musheno. 2003. Cops, Teachers, Counselors: Stories from the Front Lines of Public Service Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
  27. Maynard-Moody, Steven, and Michael Musheno. 2000. State Agent or Citizen Agent: Two Narratives of Discretion. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10(2): 329-358.
  28. Morrell, Kevin, and Graeme Currie. 2015 (accepted). Impossible Jobs or Impossible Tasks? Client Volatility and Frontline Policing Practice in Urban Riots. Public Administration Review.
  29. Newton, Jethro. 2002. Views from Below: Academics Coping with Quality. Quality in Higher Education 8(1): 39-61.
  30. Oberfield, Zachary. W. 2010. Rule Following and Discretion at Government's Frontlines: Continuity and Change During Organization Socialization. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4): 735-755.
  31. Pandey, Sanjay K., Joel C. Cantor, and Kristen Lloyd. 2014. Immigrant Health Care Access and the Affordable Care Act. Public Administration Review 74(6): 749-759.
  32. Peng, Shuyang, Sheela Pandey, and Sanjay K. Pandey. 2015 (accepted). Is There a Nonprofit Advantage? Examining the Impact of Institutional Context on Individual- Organizational Value Congruence. Public Administration Review.
  33. Perry, James L. (1996). Measuring Public Service Motivation: An Assessment of Construct Reliability and Validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 6(1): 5-22.
  34. Salamon, Lester M. 1987. Partners in Public Service: The Scope and Theory of Government- Nonprofit Relations. In The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, edited by William W. Powell, 99-117. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  35. Satyamurti, Carole. 1981. Occupational Survival: The Case of the Local Authority Social Worker. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  36. Snowbeck, Christopher. 2014a. MNsure Tapping Grants to Fix Customer Services, Balance 2015 Budget. Pioneer Press (St. Paul). March 11.*
  37. Snowbeck, Christopher. 2014b. For thousands of users, promise of MNsure is always 'pending.' Pioneer Press (St. Paul). January 30.*
  38. Soss, Joe, Richard C. Fording, and Sanford Schram. 2011. Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  39. Steenhuisen, Bauke, & van Eeten, Michel. 2013. Patterns of coping with inconsistent demands in public service delivery. Administration & Society, 45(9): 1130-1157
  40. Thompson, Frank J. 2013. Health Reform, Polarization, and Public Administration. Public Administration Review 73(s1): S3-S12.
  41. Tolbert, Caroline J., Karen Mossberger, and Ramona McNeal. 2008. Institutions, Policy Innovation, and E-Government in the American States. Public Administration Review 68(3): 549-563.
  42. Trowler, Paul. 1997. Beyond the Robbins Trap: Reconceptualizing Academic Responses to Change in Higher Education (Or… Quiet Flows the Don?). Studies in Higher Education 22(3): 301-318.
  43. Tummers, Lars. 2011. Explaining the Willingness of Public Professionals to Implement New Policies: A Policy Alienation Framework. International Review of Administrative Sciences 77(3): 555-581.
  44. Tummers, Lars. 2012. Policy Alienation of Public Professionals: The Construct and its Measurement. Public Administration Review 72(4): 516-525.
  45. Van Hulst, Merlijn, Laurens de Graaf, and Gabriël van den Brink. 2012. The Work of Exemplary Practitioners in Neighborhood Governance. Critical Policy Studies 6(4): 434-451.
  46. Wagenaar, Hendrik. 2004. "Knowing" the Rules: Administrative Work as Practice. Public Administration Review 64(6): 643-656.
  47. Watkins-Hayes, Celeste. 2009. The New Welfare Bureaucrats: Entanglements of Race, Class, and Policy Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  48. Williams, Linda M. 2015 (accepted). Beyond Enforcement: Welcomeness, Local Law Enforcement, and Immigrants. Public Administration Review.
  49. Wright, Bradley E., Donald P. Moynihan, and Sanjay K. Pandey. 2012. Pulling the levers: Transformational leadership, public service motivation, and mission valence. Public Administration Review 72(2): 206-215.

Authors
Tummers, L., & Rocco, P.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
Public Administration Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-04-20
Volume
75
Issue
6
Pages
817-827
ISSN
  • 0033-3352 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-6210
OpenAlex
W2091963440
Cited by
96
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
39.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Public Administration Review (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Commission Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (329519)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration in Developing Nations
Keywords
e-government, frontline workers, street-level bureaucrats, stress coping, Affordable Care Act, health care access, rule bending, collaboration, customer service, public service delivery, policy implementation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review