We All Need Help: “Big Data” and the Mismeasure of Public Administration
Abstract
Abstract Rapid advances in our ability to collect, analyze, and disseminate information are transforming public administration. This “big data” revolution presents opportunities for improving the management of public programs, but it also entails some risks. In addition to potentially magnifying well‐known problems with public sector performance management—particularly the problem of goal displacement—the widespread dissemination of administrative data and performance information increasingly enables external political actors to peer into and evaluate the administration of public programs. The latter trend is consequential because external actors may have little sense of the validity of performance metrics and little understanding of the policy priorities they capture. The author illustrates these potential problems using recent research on U.S. primary and secondary education and suggests that public administration scholars could help improve governance in the data‐rich future by informing the development and dissemination of organizational report cards that better capture the value that public agencies deliver.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Measuring the Impacts of Teachers II: Teacher Value-Added and Student Outcomes in Adulthood
Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., & Rockoff, J. E. (2014) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.104.9.2633 · Cited by 1,717 · see citing works
The Impact of No Child Left Behind on Student Achievement
Dee, T. S., & Jacob, B. (2011) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.1002/pam.20586 · Cited by 487 · see citing works
Reback, R., Rockoff, J., & Schwartz, H. L. (2014) · American Economic Journal Economic Policy · doi:10.1257/pol.6.3.207 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Data-based decision-making for school improvement: Research insights and gaps
Schildkamp, K. (2019) · Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00131881.2019.1625716 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Big data and AI - A transformational shift for government: So, what next for research?
Pencheva, I., Esteve, M., & Mikhaylov, S. J. (2020) · Public Policy and Administration · doi:10.1177/0952076718780537 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Big data for policymaking: Fad or fasttrack?
Giest, S. (2017) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11077-017-9293-1 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Vogl, T. M., Seidelin, C., Ganesh, B., & Bright, J. (2020) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13286 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Misconceptions about data-based decision making in education: An exploration of the literature
Mandinach, E. B., & Schildkamp, K. (2021) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100842 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
In AI we trust? Citizen perceptions of AI in government decision making
Ingrams, A., Kaufmann, W., & Jacobs, D. (2022) · Policy & Internet · doi:10.1002/poi3.276 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence and administrative evil
Young, M. M., Himmelreich, J., Bullock, J. B., & Kim, K.-C. (2021) · Perspectives on Public Management and Governance · doi:10.1093/ppmgov/gvab006 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lavertu, S.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lavertu, Stéphane
- ORCID
- Lavertu, Stéphane
- Venue
- Public Administration Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-08-18
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 864-872
- ISSN
- 0033-3352 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6210
- OpenAlex
- W1962582272
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 29.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Public Administration Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
- Keywords
- big data, public administration, performance management, goal displacement, performance indicators, political accountability, education performance, governance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review