The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparative Public Administration in a Globalized World: Moving Beyond Standard Assumptions Toward Increased Understanding
Open accessAbstract
Today's globalized world calls for a deeper understanding of how and why administrative practices differ across regions and what that means for theory and practice. However, empirical comparative studies in public administration incorporating local and regional particularities in their design, constructs, and interpretation of results are scarce, with the exception of studies on specific constructs such as public service motivation, professional values, and emerging approaches to non‐Western public administration. Consistently, scholars engaged in comparative studies highlight theoretical, methodological, and empirical difficulties in comparing public agencies, employees, and practices as the research instruments and assumptions used often originate from Western countries. Thus, there is a serious need today for adopting more context‐sensitive and balanced approaches to advance our scholarly understanding of systems and practices in different regions. This symposium aims to advance comparative public administration by bringing together novel empirical comparative contributions from scholars from different parts of the world.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There also seems to be a blind spot in the debate with respect to comparative administrative traditions, which barely play a role in the explanation of different patterns of populists transformation attempts and bureaucratic reactions to them (Van der Wal et al., 2021).”
From Public Administration Under Populist Rule: Standing Up Against Democratic Backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Van der Wal et al., 2021
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- 10.1057/978-1-137-60252-7 · DOI
- 10.1057/978-1-137-60252-7_2 · DOI
- Fukuyama Francis, 1995, Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity
- 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02489.x · DOI
- 10.1002/pad.1658 · DOI
- 10.1080/23276665.2019.1614747 · DOI
- Kettl D.F., 2005, The Global Public Management Revolution
- Khanna Parag, 2019, The Future Is Asian: Commerce, Conflict, and Culture in the 21st Century
- KMPG, 2019, KPMGs Change‐Readiness Index 2019
- Mahbubani K., 2008, The New Asian Hemisphere. The Irresistible Shift of Global Power to the East
- Mahbubani K., 2013, The Great Convergence. Asia, the West, and the Logic of One World
- Mahbubani K., 2018, Has the West Lost it?
- 10.1111/gove.12201 · DOI
- Mohr Z.T., 2021, Public Administration Review, 299
- 10.1111/puar.13092 · DOI
- 10.1111/puar.13106 · DOI
- 10.1057/9781137491459_20 · DOI
- 10.1080/01900692.2015.1122038 · DOI
- Van der Wal Z., 2020, Public Sector Innovation in the Asia Pacific—Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 10.1111/1467-8500.12435 · DOI
- 10.1080/10967494.2015.1030486 · DOI
- 10.1111/puar.13218 · DOI
- Vielmetter G., 2014, Leadership 2030: The Six Megatrends You Need to Understand to Lead Your Company into the Future
- 10.7591/9781501720383 · DOI
- World Economic Forum, 2017, The Global Competitiveness Report 2017–2018
- 10.1080/14719037.2013.798028 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Public Administration Under Populist Rule: Standing Up Against Democratic Backsliding
Bauer, M. W. (2024) · International Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1080/01900692.2023.2243400 · Cited by 104
“There also seems to be a blind spot in the debate with respect to comparative administrative traditions, which barely play a role in the explanation of different patterns of populists transformation attempts and bureaucratic reactions to them (Van der Wal et al., 2021).”
Metadata
- Authors
- van der Wal, Z., van den Berg, C., & Haque, M. S.
- Affiliations
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Corresponding author
- van der Wal, Zeger
- Venue
- Public Administration Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-03
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 295-298
- ISSN
- 0033-3352 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6210
- OpenAlex
- W3135249117
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 7.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.rug.nl
- Licence
- Locations
- Public Administration Review (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (451-14-009)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Governance
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration in Developing Nations
- Keywords
- comparative public administration, globalization, cross-national comparison, public service motivation, professional values, public agencies, public sector employees, administrative practice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative Public Administration in a Globalized World: Moving Beyond Standard Assumptions Toward Increased Understanding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/puar.13373
- The paper
- van der Wal, Z., van den Berg, C., & Haque, M. S. (2021). Comparative Public Administration in a Globalized World: Moving Beyond Standard Assumptions Toward Increased Understanding. Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13373