The DOI matches its Crossref record; 159 of the 159 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probiotic application for sustainable aquaculture
Abstract
Aquaculture, which constitutes one of the largest food production sectors in the world, is preferably practiced with natural organic products rather than with synthetic chemicals or antibiotics. In addition to the daunting challenge of providing food and livelihood to the exponentially increasing world population, the aquaculture industry is key to ensuring that development is based on environmentally sustainable practices, specifically in the production of aquafeeds. Terrestrial microorganisms that act as natural defence systems of cultured species have been identified as the main producer for the beneficial bacterial candidates. Probiotics have recently gained popularity as beneficial microbes candidates in cultured organisms to maintain the health condition and well‐being of different aquatic animals. This review aimed to understand the necessity of using probiotics as a sustainable alternative to regulate the growth performance, feed utilisation and general health condition for sustainable aquaculture. Also, explanatory discussion about the host microbiota and its ability to produce different probiotic strains and the probiotic functionality to ameliorate the host immunity to provide the interactive effects on the host‐derived probiotics. By presenting the results obtained from the previous studies about the ability of probiotics to sustain the aquatic animal's performances, this study condensed the current knowledge and information for future research and development of the probiotic application in aquaculture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Choi, S.-H., & Yoon, T. J. (2008) · Immune Network · doi:10.4110/in.2008.8.3.67 · Cited by 31
RetractedStructure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome
The Human Microbiome Project Consortium (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11234 · Cited by 11,726
The gut flora as a forgotten organ
O'Hara, A. M., & Shanahan, F. (2006) · The EMBO Reports · doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7400731 · Cited by 2,791
Probiotic Bacteria as Biological Control Agents in Aquaculture
Verschuere, L., Rombaut, G., Sorgeloos, P., & Verstraete, W. (2000) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.64.4.655-671.2000 · Cited by 2,283
Molecular Analysis of Commensal Host-Microbial Relationships in the Intestine
Hooper, L. V., Wong, M. H., Thelin, A., Hansson, L., Falk, P. G., & Gordon, J. I. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.291.5505.881 · Cited by 2,202
OXIDATIVE STRESS IN MARINE ENVIRONMENTS: Biochemistry and Physiological Ecology
Lesser, M. P. (2006) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.physiol.68.040104.110001 · Cited by 1,833
Probiotics and immunity: A fish perspective
Nayak, S. K. (2010) · Fish & Shellfish Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.fsi.2010.02.017 · Cited by 1,253
The use of probiotics in aquaculture
Gatesoupe, F. J. (1999) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/s0044-8486(99)00187-8 · Cited by 1,220
Probiotics: an overview of beneficial effects
Ouwehand, A. C., Salminen, S., & Isolauri, E. (2002) · Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · doi:10.1023/a:1020620607611 · Cited by 1,013
The current status and future focus of probiotic and prebiotic applications for salmonids
Merrifield, D. L., Dimitroglou, A., Foey, A., Davies, S. J., Baker, R. T. M., Bøgwald, J., Castex, M., & Ringø, E. (2010) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.02.007 · Cited by 995
Cited by
Nutritional immunity of fish intestines: important insights for sustainable aquaculture
Dawood, M. A. O. (2021) · Reviews in Aquaculture · doi:10.1111/raq.12492 · Cited by 577
Self-citationHost-Associated Probiotics: A Key Factor in Sustainable Aquaculture
Van Doan, H., Hoseinifar, S. H., Ringø, E., Ángeles Esteban, M., Dadar, M., Dawood, M. A. O., & Faggio, C. (2020) · Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture · doi:10.1080/23308249.2019.1643288 · Cited by 348
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Dawood, M. A. O., Koshio, S., Abdel‐Daim, M. M., & Van Doan, H.
- Venue
- Reviews in Aquaculture
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-07-09
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 907-924
- ISSN
- 1753-5123 (ISSN-L)
- 1753-5131
- OpenAlex
- W2842827498
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 159
- FWCI
- 11.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.