Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 267

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Functional traits and ecosystem services in ecological restoration

Open access
Carlucci, Marcos B., Brancalion, Pedro H. S., Rodrigues, Ricardo R., Loyola, Rafael, Cianciaruso, Marcus V.·2020·Restoration Ecology

Abstract

The application of a functional trait‐based approach to ecological restoration is receiving growing attention worldwide, but lack of knowledge on functional traits and how they link to ecosystem services imposes a major barrier to operationalize such approach. Synthesizing the existing knowledge on functional trait‐based restoration is thus a timely and important challenge. We systematically reviewed the literature to assess how ecosystem services are associated to functional traits across organisms, ecosystem types, and continents. We also assessed the existing trait‐based frameworks to target ecosystem services in restoration ecology. Then, we discussed future perspectives for the field, especially the challenges of applying trait‐based frameworks in megadiverse tropical ecosystems, which have ambitious restoration commitments. Most papers focused on plants (72%), terrestrial habitats (69%), and non‐tropical ecosystems (68%) and monitored ecosystem services and functional traits after restoration started rather than using them as previous targets. Only 12% of the papers targeted the restoration of both services and traits a priori, and 3.8% presented a clear trait‐based framework to target ecosystem services in restoration. The possibility of selecting alternative subsets of complementary species in their provisioning of ecosystem services should make functional restoration more feasible than traditional approaches in species‐rich tropical ecosystems. With this review and our critical insights on the perspectives of applying functional trait‐based restoration widely, we hope to assist broad‐scale restoration programs to obtain higher levels of benefits for nature and human well‐being per unit of area undergoing restoration, going beyond the area‐based approach that has dominated restoration commitments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/rec.13279

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 72 references

Metadata

Authors
Carlucci, M. B., Brancalion, P. H. S., Rodrigues, R. R., Loyola, R., & Cianciaruso, M. V.
Venue
Restoration Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-11
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
1372-1383
ISSN
  • 1061-2971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-100X
OpenAlex
W3083406028
Cited by
267
References
72
FWCI
19.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional traits and ecosystem services in ecological restoration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/rec.13279
The paper
Carlucci, M. B., Brancalion, P. H. S., Rodrigues, R. R., Loyola, R., & Cianciaruso, M. V. (2020). Functional traits and ecosystem services in ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13279

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.