Cited by 31World Trade Organization LawEU Law and Policy AnalysisInternational Environmental Law and Policies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Palm oil, the RED II and WTO law: EU sustainable biofuel policy tangled up in green?

Open access
Mayr, Stefan, Hollaus, Birgit, Madner, Verena·2021·Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law

Abstract

New European Union (EU) rules on biofuels have led to mounting tensions between the EU and some of its trading partners. A particularly contentious measure is the ‘freeze and phase‐out’ of certain biofuels in the transport sector with a high indirect land‐use change risk, as introduced by the recast of the Renewable Energy Directive. In light of Indonesia’s recent move to initiate proceedings against the EU at the World Trade Organization (WTO), this article systematically explores relevant key concepts of WTO law and analyses the compatibility of the EU measures with the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Agreement). While the EU measures are carefully crafted to avoid potential WTO pitfalls—such as applicability of the TBT Agreement—the article identifies several critical aspects that raise doubts about the measure’s compatibility with WTO law. In particular, the seemingly deliberate targeting of palm oil casts doubt on the justification of the measure on environmental grounds.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/reel.12386

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 2
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 3
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 4
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 5
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 6
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 7
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 8
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 9
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 10
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 11
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 12
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Mayr, S., Hollaus, B., & Madner, V.
Venue
Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-12-07
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
233-248
ISSN
  • 2050-0386 (ISSN-L)
  • 2050-0394
OpenAlex
W3111963568
Cited by
31
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2
FWCI
14.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ePubWU Institutional Repository (Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • WU Research (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Norges Forskningsråd (223274)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › World Trade Organization Law
  • Social Sciences › Law › EU Law and Policy Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › International Environmental Law and Policies
Keywords
palm oil, RED II, Renewable Energy Directive, EU biofuel policy, WTO law, GATT, TBT Agreement, indirect land use change, trade and environment, sustainable biofuels

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review