The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
To ban or not to ban carbon‐intensive materials: A legal and administrative assessment of product carbon requirements
Open accessAbstract
By setting near‐zero‐emission requirements for the production of certain products to be sold on the European single market (product carbon requirements, PCRs), the European Union could accelerate the phase‐out of carbon‐intensive production processes. The announcement of such requirements would send a signal to producers, financing institutions and other relevant stakeholders, thus incentivizing them to prepare for the shift to a carbon‐neutral society. This article analyses several European environmental standards and technical regulations to offer insights into the political, legal and technical background for the adoption of PCRs. It shows that PCRs would constitute a new development in technical regulations. Given the relevance of World Trade Organization law for the adoption of standards and technical regulations on products, the article analyses in further detail the compatibility of PCRs under WTO law, and argues that PCRs can be designed in line with the provisions of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Standards on embodied emissions in basic materials can take the form of minimum performance standards excluding production processes that exceed a certain carbon intensity threshold.
“standards on the embodied emissions in basic materials can take the shape of minimum performance standards for materials sourced from production processes, excluding those exceeding a certain carbon intensity threshold (118).”
From Carbon Leakage, Consumption, and Trade (2022) · cites this paper as [118]
Citations
Cites
Border tax adjustment: a feasible way to support stringent emission trading
Ismer, R., & Neuhoff, K. (2007) · European Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1007/s10657-007-9032-8 · Cited by 244
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Carbon Leakage, Consumption, and Trade
Grubb, M., Jordan, N. D., Hertwich, E., Neuhoff, K., Das, K., Bandyopadhyay, K. R., van Asselt, H., Sato, M., Wang, R., Pizer, W. A., et al. (2022) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-120820-053625 · Cited by 210
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gerres, T., Haussner, M., Neuhoff, K., & Pirlot, A.
- Affiliations
- German Institute for Economic Research (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Pirlot, Alice
- Venue
- Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-05-06
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 249-262
- ISSN
- 2050-0386 (ISSN-L)
- 2050-0394
- OpenAlex
- W3170539836
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 6.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Graduate Institute Geneva Institutional Repository (Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › World Trade Organization Law
- Social Sciences › Law › EU Law and Policy Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › International Environmental Law and Policies
- Keywords
- technical regulations, WTO law, Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, environmental standards, European Union, carbon neutrality, trade and environment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
