The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The more subsidies, the longer survival? Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms
Abstract
Abstract How do government subsidies affect firm survival? By using Chinese firm‐level data for 1998 to 2007, we show that, on average, there is a positive and significant impact of government subsidies on firm survival. We also investigate the heterogeneous effects of government subsidies with different intensities on firm survival, and find that moderate‐intensity government subsidies exert a positive impact on firm survival, while high‐intensity government subsidies increase the exit probabilities, the underlying mechanisms via subsidy‐seeking investment and innovation incentive weakening are supported by empirical evidence. Furthermore, we explore the role of governance institutions in the subsidy–survival relationship, and find that the positive impact of government subsidies on firm survival is more pronounced in regions with better governance institutions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Mao and Xu (2018) argue that there should be a moderate range of government subsidies in which companies can be more productive.”
From Integration of TAM and TPB in Explaining Technology Adoption Intentions: A Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling Approach (2022) · cites this paper as Mao and Xu (2018)
Citations
Cites
The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Industry
Olley, G. S., & Pakes, A. (1992) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/2171831 · Cited by 7,142
Estimating Production Functions Using Inputs to Control for Unobservables
Levinsohn, J., & Petrin, A. (2003) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-937x.00246 · Cited by 6,641
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1985) · The American Statistician · doi:10.2307/2683903 · Cited by 6,472
Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis
MacKinnon, D. P. (2012) · doi:10.4324/9780203809556 · Cited by 5,618
Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive
Baumol, W. J. (1990) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261712 · Cited by 3,649
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1994) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118354 · Cited by 3,440
Creative accounting or creative destruction? Firm-level productivity growth in Chinese manufacturing
Brandt, L., Biesebroeck, J. V., & Zhang, Y. (2011) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2011.02.002 · Cited by 2,313
Trade Liberalization, Intermediate Inputs, and Productivity: Evidence from Indonesia
Amiti, M., & Konings, J. (2007) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.97.5.1611 · Cited by 2,269
Geroski, P. A. (1995) · International Journal of Industrial Organization · doi:10.1016/0167-7187(95)00498-x · Cited by 1,992
Why Is Rent-Seeking So Costly to Growth?
Murphy, K., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-79247-5_11 · Cited by 1,480
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Battistin E., 2001, Econometric evaluation of active labour market policies in Europe
- Fan G., 2010, China market index
- Li C., 2010, Innovation activities in Chinese manufacturing firms: The roles of firm ownership and CEO incentives, Economic Research Journal, 5, 55
- Ren S. M., 2013, The subsidy, the rent‐seeking cost and the rate of the markup: A case study on the equipment‐manufacturing enterprises in China, Management World, 118
- Vartia L., 2004, Assessing plant entry and exit dynamics and survival—does firms’ financial status matter
- Yu M., 2010, Political connections, rent seeking, and the fiscal subsidy efficiency of local governments, Economic Research Journal, 65
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chen, X. (2022) · doi:10.1016/j.jik.2022.100189 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Mao, Q., & Xu, J.
- Affiliations
- Nankai University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Xu, Jiayun
- ORCID
- Venue
- Review of Development Economics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-11-29
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 685-705
- ISSN
- 1363-6669 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9361
- OpenAlex
- W2769108739
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 0.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Review of Development Economics (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (71403135, 71773055)
- Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (16YJC790114)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Innovation Policy and R&D
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Firm Innovation and Growth
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
- Keywords
- government subsidies, business survival, firm exit, innovation incentives, governance institutions, Chinese manufacturing firms, firm heterogeneity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
