The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A General Framework for Updating Belief Distributions
Open accessAbstract
Summary: We propose a framework for general Bayesian inference. We argue that a valid update of a prior belief distribution to a posterior can be made for parameters which are connected to observations through a loss function rather than the traditional likelihood function, which is recovered as a special case. Modern application areas make it increasingly challenging for Bayesians to attempt to model the true data-generating mechanism. For instance, when the object of interest is low dimensional, such as a mean or median, it is cumbersome to have to achieve this via a complete model for the whole data distribution. More importantly, there are settings where the parameter of interest does not directly index a family of density functions and thus the Bayesian approach to learning about such parameters is currently regarded as problematic. Our framework uses loss functions to connect information in the data to functionals of interest. The updating of beliefs then follows from a decision theoretic approach involving cumulative loss functions. Importantly, the procedure coincides with Bayesian updating when a true likelihood is known yet provides coherent subjective inference in much more general settings. Connections to other inference frameworks are highlighted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970
On Information and Sufficiency
Kullback, S., & Leibler, R. A. (1951) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729694 · Cited by 20,193
Robust estimation of a location parameter
Huber, P. J. (1964) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177703732 · Cited by 7,228
Prediction, Learning, and Games
Cesa-Bianchi, N., & Lugosi, G. (2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511546921 · Cited by 3,162
Bernardo, J. M., & Smith, A. F. M. (1994) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316870 · Cited by 2,178
Biclustering of expression data.
Cheng, Y., & Church, G. M. (2000) · PubMed · Cited by 2,098
Huber, P. J., & Ronchetti, E. M. (2009) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470434697 · Cited by 1,718
La prévision : ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives
de Finetti, B. (1937) · French digital mathematics library (Numdam) · Cited by 1,642
The Selection of Prior Distributions by Formal Rules
Kass, R. E., & Wasserman, L. (1996) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1996.10477003 · Cited by 1,308
Cited by
Haplotype-based inference of recent effective population size in modern and ancient DNA samples
Fournier, R., Tsangalidou, Z., Reich, D., & Palamara, P. F. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-43522-6 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Bissiri, P. G., Holmes, C. C., & Walker, S. G.
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-02-23
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1103-1130
- ISSN
- 1369-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9868
- OpenAlex
- W2243651912
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 11.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A General Framework for Updating Belief Distributions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/rssb.12158
- The paper
- Bissiri, P. G., Holmes, C. C., & Walker, S. G. (2016). A General Framework for Updating Belief Distributions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssb.12158
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.