Case report: Rehabilitation of a child with dentinogenesis imperfecta with CAD/CAM approach: Three‐year follow‐up
Abstract
Aim This study was aimed to describe a minimally invasive and effective method for the aesthetic and functional teeth restoration in dentinogenesis imperfecta (DGI-II) patient. Methods and results A six-year-old boy visited orthodontist and pediatric dentist for the initial consultation with the complaints of aesthetic problems. The treatment plan aimed to correct the vertical dimension of occlusion by prosthetics of the posterior group of teeth with individual milled crowns, followed by restoration of the anterior teeth with crowns made up of the composite material. The digital prosthetic protocol that included the use of an intraoral scanner to take the impressions, minimal teeth preparation, and individual manufacturing via CAD/CAM was followed. Crowns for the first permanent molars were milled from titanium. Crowns from composite material were made on the incisors of the upper and lower jaw, the diastemas between the teeth were closed with the crowns, and the aesthetic disadvantage was corrected. Conclusion As a result of the complex treatment, the function and aesthetics were restored, and the prevention of further tooth wear was implemented. This method of rehabilitation is suitable to treat DGI. During 3 years of follow-up, the treatment outcome was considered stable.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The use of digital technologies in the treatment of GDDs has been only partially recognized.
“To date, this trend has been only partially recognized in the treatment of GDDs (e.g., Sarapultseva et al. 2020), representing another knowledge gap.”
From Dental Management of Genetic Dental Disorders: A Critical Review (2025) · cites this paper as Sarapultseva et al. 2020
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dental Management of Genetic Dental Disorders: A Critical Review
Dujic, H., Bücher, K., Schüler, I. M., Schmidt, P., Hertel, S., Timpel, J., Jablonski-Momeni, A., Schilke, R., Kapferer-Seebacher, I., Zschocke, J., et al. (2025) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/00220345241305330 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“To date, this trend has been only partially recognized in the treatment of GDDs (e.g., Sarapultseva et al. 2020), representing another knowledge gap.”
- Authors
- Sarapultseva, M., Leleko, A., & Sarapultsev, A.
- Affiliations
- Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
- Corresponding author
- Sarapultseva, Maria
- Venue
- Special Care in Dentistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-07-26
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 511-518
- ISSN
- 0275-1879 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-4505
- OpenAlex
- W3045237274
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Special Care in Dentistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Government Contract of the Russian Federation with the Institute of Immunology and Physiology (AAAA-A18-118020690020-1)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Dental materials and restorations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › dental development and anomalies
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
- Keywords
- dentinogenesis imperfecta, CAD/CAM crowns, vertical dimension of occlusion, composite resin crowns, diastema closure, intraoral scanning, minimally invasive restorative treatment, tooth wear prevention, esthetic dentistry
- MeSH terms
- Child, Crowns, Dentinogenesis Imperfecta, Esthetics, Dental, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Computer-Aided Design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review