The influence of an eHealth intervention for adults with type 2 diabetes on the patient–nurse relationship: a qualitative study
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A constructive patient-nurse relationship is beneficial in self-management support approaches. Research indicates eHealth interventions hold a potential for self-management support for adults with type 2 diabetes. However, eHealth may change the patient-nurse relationship. No studies to date have addressed how eHealth self-management support interventions with written asynchronous communication can influence the relationship between patients and nurses. AIM: The aim of this study was to explore how an eHealth intervention based on the Guided Self-Determination program (eGSD) influences the patient-nurse relationship from the perspective of patients participating and the nurses conducting the intervention. METHODS: A qualitative approach with individual semi-structured interviews was used. Ten patients with type 2 diabetes who completed the eGSD and four nurses who delivered the intervention participated. The data were transcribed verbatim, and qualitative content analysis was used to analyse the text. RESULTS: The findings revealed two themes: 'eGSD facilitates a reciprocal understanding and a flexibility in the relationship' and 'eGSD creates a more fragile relationship', reflecting ambiguous experiences with the eGSD. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The findings indicate that eGSD influences the patient-nurse relationship by facilitating reciprocal understanding and flexibility. Both patients and RNs acknowledged these outcomes as beneficial. Nevertheless, familiar in-person consultations were expressed as integral for the patient-nurse relationship. As written communication in eHealth is a novelty, it demands new knowledge and expertise that RNs must master. Findings from this study may therefore be acknowledged when developing and implementing eHealth interventions. Education programs in written eHealth communication, as well as guidelines and frameworks on how to professionally and effectively conduct eHealth services while maintaining supportive patient-nurse relationships, should be a priority for institutions that educate healthcare personnel, health institutions and other stakeholders.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The potential for misunderstandings in written digital communication was recognized by clinicians, particularly for diabetes and young individuals with long-term conditions.
“The potential for misunderstandings in written digital communication was also recognized by clinicians, particularly for diabetes and young individuals with long-term conditions [88,89].”
From Effectiveness and Acceptability of Asynchronous Digital Health in Asthma Care: Mixed Methods Systematic Review (2024) · cites this paper as [88]
Cites
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 27,815 · see citing works
Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines
Malterud, K. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05627-6 · Cited by 5,014 · see citing works
How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis
Bengtsson, M. (2016) · NursingPlus Open · doi:10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001 · Cited by 4,616 · see citing works
Self-Determination Theory Applied to Health Contexts: A Meta-Analysis
Ng, J. Y. Y., Ntoumanis, N., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Duda, J. L., & Williams, G. C. (2012) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691612447309 · Cited by 1,959 · see citing works
Computer-based diabetes self-management interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Pal, K., Eastwood, S. V., Michie, S., Farmer, A. J., Barnard, M. L., Peacock, R., Wood, B., Inniss, J. D., & Murray, E. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008776.pub2 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Cotter, A. P., Durant, N., Agne, A. A., & Cherrington, A. L. (2014) · Journal of Diabetes and its Complications · doi:10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2013.07.003 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Williams, G. C., Lynch, M., & Glasgow, R. E. (2007) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.26.6.728 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Brandt, C. J., Clemensen, J., Nielsen, J. B., & Søndergaard, J. (2018) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017466 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Jelin, E., Granum, V., & Eide, H. (2012) · Pain Management Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.pmn.2011.08.008 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Uzzaman, N., Hammersley, V., McClatchey, K., Sheringham, J., Singh, D., Habib, G. M., & Pinnock, H. (2024) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/57708 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lie, S. S., Karlsen, B., Graue, M., & Oftedal, B.
- Affiliations
- VID Specialized University (NO)
- University of Stavanger (NO)
- Western Norway University of Applied Sciences (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Lie, Silje S.
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-03-13
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 741-749
- ISSN
- 0283-9318 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-6712
- OpenAlex
- W2921156089
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 4.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Norges Forskningsråd (221065)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Keywords
- digital health interventions, type 2 diabetes, nurse-patient relationship, self-management support, nurses' perceptions, patient perspectives, in-person consultation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Communication, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nurse-Patient Relations, Nursing Staff, Self Care, Telemedicine, Qualitative Research, Telenursing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review