Cited by 12Biofield Effects and BiophysicsStress Responses and CortisolMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Assessment of hormonal parameters and psychological well‐being in healthy subjects after a Taoist qigong program: An exploratory study

Vera, Francisca M., Manzaneque, Juan M., Rodríguez, Francisco M., Vadillo, Miguel, Navajas, Federico, Heiniger, Ana I., Pérez, Vidal, Blanca, M. José·2019·Scandinavian Journal of Psychology

Abstract

Qigong is an ancient form of health maintenance, which is part of Traditional China Medicine. Numerous beneficial mental and physical effects have been classically ascribed to this traditional psychosomatic method. The purpose of this work has been to assess the effects of Taoist qigong practice on several hormonal parameters of the Hipotalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal axis and specific measures of psychological well-being in healthy subjects. Forty-three healthy volunteers participated in the study, of whom 22 were randomly allocated to the experimental group, and 21 were assigned to the control group. Experimental participants underwent a qigong training program for one month. Blood samples for the quantification of hormonal parameters, and several instruments to assess anxiety and depression symptoms as well as subjective sleep quality, were obtained before and after the program. Statistically significant differences were found between the experimental and control groups, with the experimental group showing lower blood levels of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH). This study shows that Taoist qigong is a psychosomatic method able to exert a modulatory action on ACTH levels in healthy subjects. We consider the need to continue exploring the psychobiological modulation of this qigong method and its possible repercussion for human health care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/sjop.12501

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vera, F. M., Manzaneque, J. M., Rodríguez, F. M., Vadillo, M., Navajas, F., Heiniger, A. I., Pérez, V., & Blanca, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Málaga (ES)
  • Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Laboratorio AGS Málaga Spain
  • Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga (ES)
Corresponding author
Vera, Francisca M.
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-11-14
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pages
43-49
ISSN
  • 0036-5564 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9450
OpenAlex
W2901476906
Cited by
12
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biofield Effects and Biophysics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
ACTH, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, psychological well-being, anxiety, depression, sleep quality, traditional Chinese medicine, psychosomatic treatment, healthy volunteers
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adrenocorticotropic Hormone, Adult, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Personal Satisfaction, Pilot Projects, Sleep, Young Adult, Healthy Volunteers, Qigong

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review