Cited by 121Physical Activity and HealthObesity, Physical Activity, DietSports and Physical Education Studies

Secular and longitudinal physical activity changes in population‐based samples of children and adolescents

Dalene, K. E., Anderssen, S. A., Andersen, L. B., Steene‐Johannessen, J., Ekelund, U., Hansen, B. H., Kolle, E.·2018·Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports

Abstract

The aims of this study were to investigate whether physical activity (PA) and sedentary time (ST) in 9‐ and 15‐year‐olds differed between 2005‐2006 and 2011‐2012 (secular change), and to investigate changes in PA and ST from age 9 to 15 (longitudinal change). In 2005‐2006, we invited nationally representative samples of Norwegian 9‐ (n=1470) and 15‐year‐olds (n=1348) to participate. In 2011‐2012, we invited a new nationally representative sample of 9‐year‐olds (n=1945), whereas 15‐year‐olds (n=1759) were invited to participate either based on previous participation in 2005‐2006 or from a random sample of schools. We assessed PA and ST objectively using accelerometers. In 2011‐2012, both 9‐ and 15‐year‐olds spent more time sedentary (≥35.7 min/d, P<.001) and less time in light PA (≥35.2 min/d, P<.001) compared to their peers in 2005‐2006. Nine‐year‐old girls also spent less time in moderate‐to‐vigorous PA (MVPA) (4.2 min/d, P=.041). In both age groups, the proportion accumulating an average of 60 min/d of MVPA did not differ between the two cohorts. From age 9 to 15, girls and boys decreased their time spent in LPA (≥106.7 min/d, P<.001) and in MVPA (≥20.8 min/d, P<.001). During the same period, ST increased by a mean of >2 h/d (P<.011). We observed an adverse secular change in PA from 2005‐2006 to 2011‐2012 among 9‐ and 15‐year‐olds, and a large decline in PA in the participants followed longitudinally from age 9 to 15 years.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/sms.12876

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 121

Authors
Dalene, K. E., Anderssen, S. A., Andersen, L. B., Steene‐Johannessen, J., Ekelund, U., Hansen, B. H., & Kolle, E.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian School of Sport Sciences (NO)
  • Høgskulen i Sogn og Fjordane (NO)
Corresponding author
Dalene, K. E.
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-04-10
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
161-171
ISSN
  • 0905-7188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0838
OpenAlex
W2595383975
Cited by
121
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14
FWCI
11.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Norwegian Directorate of Health and the Norwegian School of Sport Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Sports and Physical Education Studies
Keywords
physical activity, sedentary time, secular trends, longitudinal change, children, adolescents, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, light physical activity, sex differences, accelerometer-measured activity, Norwegian children
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Norway, Time Factors, Exercise, Sedentary Behavior, Accelerometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review