More‐than‐human families: Pets, people, and practices in multispecies households
Abstract
Although humans have coexisted with dogs and cats for thousands of years, that coexistence has taken on various meanings over time. Only recently have people openly included their pets as members of the family. Yet, because of the cultural ambivalence toward animals, what it means for a pet to “be” a family member remains unsettled. Drawing from research on family practices including kinship, household routines, childhood socialization, and domestic violence, this paper considers how pets participate in “doing” family and what their presence means for this social arrangement long considered quintessentially human. Today's more‐than‐human families represent a hybrid of relations, human and animal and social and natural, rather than an entirely new kind of family. Becoming family has always been contingent on a cast of nonhuman characters, and recognition of the “more‐than‐human” can enhance sociological understanding, not only of the family but also of other aspects of social life.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pets are often an integral part of the family structure.
“As noted by Bowen [78] and others [43,44,54,79,80,81], pets are often an integral part of the family structure.”
From Disenfranchised Guilt-Pet Owners' Burden. (2022) · cites this paper as [79]
Cites
Early taming of the cat in Cyprus
Vigne, J.-D., Guilaine, J., Debue, K., Haye, L., & Gérard, P. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1095335 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Disenfranchised Guilt-Pet Owners' Burden.
Kogan, L. R., Bussolari, C., Currin-McCulloch, J., Packman, W., & Erdman, P. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12131690 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
- Authors
- Irvine, L., & Cilia, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- Corresponding author
- Irvine, Leslie
- Venue
- Sociology Compass
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-02
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1751-9020 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2586823189
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 5.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sociology Compass (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
- Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geographies of human-animal interactions
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Keywords
- PET, human-animal relations, kinship, general practice, child socialization, domestic violence, dogs, cats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review