Trajectories of Breadth of Participation in Organized Activity During Childhood
Abstract
This study aimed to identify the trajectories of breadth of participation in organized activities during childhood and to examine the predictors of membership in these trajectories (child's individual and family characteristics measured in Kindergarten). A sample of 1038 children, recruited in Kindergarten, was assessed yearly between Kindergarten and grade 4. Semiparametric group‐based modeling brought out four trajectories: the no participation group (13.5 percent), the increasing group (26.4 percent), the decreasing group (14.1 percent), and the high group (46.1 percent). Prosociality predicted membership in the no participation group, as compared with the increasing group. Social withdrawal predicted membership in the no participation group, as compared with the high group. High family income and higher maternal education predicted membership in the increasing, decreasing, and high trajectory groups, as compared with the no participation group. Higher paternal education predicted membership in the high group, as compared with the increasing group. Overall, family variables had a greater impact than individual variables on the probability that the child would participate in a broader range of organized activities.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sustained engagement in ECA is linked to more positive behavioural indicators such as prosociality, compared to increasing or declining participation in primary school.
“Moreover, sustained engagement in ECA is linked to more positive behavioural indicators such as prosociality, compared to increasing or declining participation in primary school (Aumetre & Poulin, 2015).”
From Participation in extracurricular activities predicts academic growth and mediates socioeconomic inequalities in primary school (2026) · cites this paper as Aumetre & Poulin, 2015
Cites
Feldman, A. F., & Matjasko, J. L. (2005) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543075002159 · Cited by 815 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Brunet, L., Rémeau, M., Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2026) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.70127
- Authors
- Aumètre, F., & Poulin, F.
- Affiliations
- Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Poulin, François
- ORCID
- Poulin, François
- Venue
- Social Development
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-07-22
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 352-369
- ISSN
- 0961-205X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9507
- OpenAlex
- W1576151126
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Development (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
- Keywords
- organized activities, childhood, prosocial behavior, social withdrawal, household income, maternal education, paternal education, family socioeconomic status, kindergarten children, extracurricular activities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review