The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Twenty Years of Rural Entrepreneurship: A Bibliometric Survey
Abstract
Entrepreneurship has become a dynamic field of research in the last two decades. However, ‘rural entrepreneurship’ has been largely overlooked. It seems therefore timely to present a quantitative survey of the literature in this particular area. Based on 181 articles on rural entrepreneurship published in journals indexed in S copus, we found that rural entrepreneurship is an essentially E uropean concern, whose most prolific authors are affiliated with institutions in the UK and S pain. Organisational characteristics, policy measures and institutional frameworks and governance have attracted considerable attention in recent years, being considered emergent topics of research. In contrast, theory building has not attracted much research over the period in analysis, which suggests that the theoretical body of rural entrepreneurship is still incipient, hindering the establishment of its boundaries and of a suitable research agenda. Empirical literature on rural entrepreneurship has focused mainly on developed countries, most notably, the UK, the USA,S pain,F inland and G reece. Given the potential rural entrepreneurship represents for less developed and underdeveloped countries, more research on the topic targeting these countries is an imperative.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness
Granovetter, M. (1985) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/228311 · Cited by 28,745
An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.
Loasby, B. J., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1983) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232409 · Cited by 21,366
Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology
Portes, A. (1998) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.1 · Cited by 12,037 · cited 1×
“Other authors, such as Barkham (1994) and Portes (1998), highlight the importance of entrepreneurs’ social capital, i.e., the ability of actors to take advantage of their social structures, networks, collaborations and ties (Woolcock & Narayan, 2000).”
BackgroundThe Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2000.2791611 · Cited by 11,223
Church, J. A. (2001) · Journal of Government Information · doi:10.1016/s1352-0237(01)00307-0 · Cited by 9,153
(1934) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 7,609
Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses
Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.07-9492lsf · Cited by 5,039
Social Capital: Implications for Development Theory, Research, and Policy
Woolcock, M., & Narayan, D. (2000) · The World Bank Research Observer · doi:10.1093/wbro/15.2.225 · Cited by 4,339 · cited 1×
“Other authors, such as Barkham (1994) and Portes (1998), highlight the importance of entrepreneurs’ social capital, i.e., the ability of actors to take advantage of their social structures, networks, collaborations and ties (Woolcock & Narayan, 2000).”
BackgroundCompetitive Advantage of Nations
Porter, M. (1990) · Competitive Intelligence Review · doi:10.1002/cir.3880010112 · Cited by 3,178
The Promise of Enterpreneurship as a Field of Research
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259271 · Cited by 2,007
Cited by
Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar: A content comprehensiveness comparison
S. Adriaanse, L., & Rensleigh, C. (2013) · The Electronic Library · doi:10.1108/el-12-2011-0174 · Cited by 284
ICTs in the transformation of rural enterprises in China: A multi-layer perspective
Zhou, Q., Gao, P., & Chimhowu, A. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.04.026 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Pato, M. L., & Teixeira, A. A. C.
- Venue
- Sociologia Ruralis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-10-09
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-28
- ISSN
- 0038-0199 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9523
- OpenAlex
- W1554448047
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 81
- FWCI
- 17.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Twenty Years of Rural Entrepreneurship: A Bibliometric Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/soru.12058
- The paper
- Pato, M. L., & Teixeira, A. A. C. (2016). Twenty Years of Rural Entrepreneurship: A Bibliometric Survey. Sociologia Ruralis. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12058
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.