Trait Extraversion and Dopamine Function
Abstract
An influential theory within personality neuroscience suggests that trait extraversion is underpinned by individual differences in dopamine function. In a review of the relevant literature, we evaluate this theory in light of the evidence from molecular genetics, neuroimaging, and psychopharmacology. Evidence linking individual differences in extraversion with dopamine‐relevant genes, structural volume of dopamine‐rich brain regions (e.g., in striatal and ventral prefrontal areas), dopamine receptor availability, and frontal alpha asymmetry is mixed at best. Evidence concerning both scalp recorded (electroencephalogram) and hemodynamic (functional magnetic resonance imaging) neural responses to rewards appears somewhat more promising. Perhaps the best evidence concerns extraversion‐dependent responses – both neural and behavioural – to dopaminergic drugs. Future research in this area must go beyond the demonstration of theoretically consistent associations and attempt to provide more specific causal evidence for the dopamine hypothesis of extraversion. A further challenge is to expand this hypothesis to incorporate other neurobiological processes that are likely to underlie this trait.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dopamine-related genes and levels of dopamine predict variation in personality traits.
“Findings generally show that dopamine‐related genes and levels of dopamine predict variation in personality traits (Chen et al., 2011, 2012; Fischer et al., 2018; Wacker & Smillie, 2015)”
From Systematic reviews of the acute effects of amphetamine on working memory and other cognitive performances in healthy individuals, with a focus on the potential influence of personality traits (2023) · cites this paper as Wacker & Smillie, 2015
Cites
Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases
Manolio, T. A., Collins, F. S., Cox, N. J., Goldstein, D. B., Hindorff, L. A., Hunter, D. J., McCarthy, M. I., Ramos, E. M., Cardon, L. R., Chakravarti, A., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08494 · Cited by 8,336 · see citing works
What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience?
Berridge, K. C., & Robinson, T. E. (1998) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(98)00019-8 · Cited by 4,127 · see citing works
depue, R. A., & morrone-strupinsky, J. V. (2005) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x05000063 · Cited by 958 · see citing works
Oxytocin pathways and the evolution of human behavior
Carter, C. S. (2014) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115110 · Cited by 714 · see citing works
Motivation Deficit in ADHD is Associated with Dysfunction of the Dopamine Reward Pathway
Volkow, N. D., Wang, G.-J., Newcorn, J. H., Kollins, S. H., Wigal, T. L., Telang, F., Fowler, J. S., Goldstein, R. Z., Klein, N., Logan, J., et al. (2011) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2010.97 · Cited by 429 · see citing works
Extraversion and Reward Processing
Smillie, L. D. (2013) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721412470133 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Self-citationDopaminergic foundations of personality and individual differences
Smillie, L. D., & Wacker, J. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00874 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Emerging Neuroscience of Intrinsic Motivation: A New Frontier in Self-Determination Research
Di Domenico, S. I., & Ryan, R. M. (2017) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00145 · Cited by 542 · see citing works
Kassim, F. M. (2023) · Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental · doi:10.1002/hup.2856 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“…show that dopamine‐related genes and levels of dopamine predict variation in personality traits (Chen et al., 2011, 2012; Fischer et al., 2018; Wacker & Smillie, 2015) and plays an important role in individual behaviour differences (Depue & Collins, 1999; Norbury & Husain, 2015; Smillie,…”
BackgroundMethodIs Adolescence a Sensitive Period for the Development of Incentive-Reward Motivation?
Luciana, M., & Collins, P. F. (2021) · Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences · doi:10.1007/7854_2021_275 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wacker, J., & Smillie, L. D.
- Affiliations
- Universität Hamburg (DE)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Wacker, Jan
- Venue
- Social and Personality Psychology Compass
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 225-238
- ISSN
- 1751-9004 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1544778142
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 2.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social and Personality Psychology Compass (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- dopamine, individual differences, striatum, ventral prefrontal cortex, frontal alpha asymmetry, reward processing, dopaminergic therapy, dopamine genes, personality neuroscience
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review