Cited by 18Digital Imaging in MedicineImage Processing Techniques and ApplicationsPhotography and Visual Culture

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Focusing and depth of field in photography: application in dermatology practice

Taheri, Arash, Yentzer, Brad A., Feldman, Steven R.·2013·Skin Research and Technology

Abstract

Background Conventional photography obtains a sharp image of objects within a given 'depth of field'; objects not within the depth of field are out of focus. In recent years, digital photography revolutionized the way pictures are taken, edited, and stored. However, digital photography does not result in a deeper depth of field or better focusing. Methods In this article, we briefly review the concept of depth of field and focus in photography as well as new technologies in this area. Results A deep depth of field is used to have more objects in focus; a shallow depth of field can emphasize a subject by blurring the foreground and background objects. The depth of field can be manipulated by adjusting the aperture size of the camera, with smaller apertures increasing the depth of field at the cost of lower levels of light capture. Light-field cameras are a new generation of digital cameras that offer several new features, including the ability to change the focus on any object in the image after taking the photograph. Conclusion Understanding depth of field and camera technology helps dermatologists to capture their subjects in focus more efficiently.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/srt.12058

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 10.1109/34.121783 · DOI
  2. RenNg.Digital light field photography. Available at:http://www.lytro.com/renng-thesis.pdf(Accessed 30 August 2012)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Taheri, A., Yentzer, B. A., & Feldman, S. R.
Affiliations
Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
Taheri, Arash
Venue
Skin Research and Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-03-25
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
394-397
ISSN
  • 0909-752X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0846
OpenAlex
W1990527617
Cited by
18
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Skin Research and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Amgen
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Galderma
  • Genentech
  • Allergan
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Digital Imaging in Medicine
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Image Processing Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Photography and Visual Culture
Keywords
depth of field, camera focus, dermatologic photography, aperture size, light field camera, digital photography, image blurring, camera technology
MeSH terms
Dermatology, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Photography, Skin Diseases, Dermoscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review