Cited by 8Plant Disease Management TechniquesPlant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases

Microbial dynamics and natural remediation patterns of F usarium ‐infested watermelon soil under 3‐yr of continuous fallow condition

Wu, H.‐S., Gao, Z.‐Q., Zhou, X.‐D., Shi, X., Wang, M.‐Y., Shang, X.‐X., Liu, Y.‐D., Gu, D.‐L., Wang, W.‐Z.·2013·Soil Use and Management

Abstract

Abstract Long‐term monoculture of watermelon results in inhibited growth and decreased crop yields, possibly because of imbalance in microbial ecology caused by accumulation of the pathogen in soil. This results in serious problems in the economics of watermelon production. We investigated the build‐up of F usarium in soil under watermelon cultivation and changes over 3 yr of fallow in a microcosm. We focused on changes in the microbial community of F usarium‐infected soil, including the diversity of the microfloral species composition, and species abundance. Long‐term monoculture of watermelon leads to changes in microbial diversity and community structure. The microbes most readily cultured from infested soil were suppressed by watermelon wilt pathogen F usarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum ( FON ). Of 52 isolated and identified culturable microbes, 83.3% of bacteria, 85.7% of actinomycetes, 31.6% of fungi and 20.0% of Fusarium sp. were inhibited by FON on bioassay plates. Prior to fallowing, infested soil was a transformed ‘fungus‐type’ soil. After 3 yr of fallow, the infested soil had remediated naturally, and soil microbial diversity recovered considerably. Abundance of dominant bacterial populations was increased by 118–177%, actinomycetes, fungi and FON were decreased by 23–32, 33–37 and 50%, respectively. The ratio of bacteria: actnomycetes: fungus: F usarium sp. in infested soil changed from 24 000:100:4:1 prior to fallow to 57 000:100:3.5:1 after fallowing, nearer to the 560 000:400:8:1 ratio of healthy soil not used for watermelon cultivation. This suggests the ‘fungus‐type’ soil was converting to ‘bacteria‐type’ soil and that disrupted microbial communities in infested soil were restored during fallow.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/sum.12029

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, H. ‐., Gao, Z. ‐., Zhou, X. ‐., Shi, X., Wang, M. ‐., Shang, X. ‐., Liu, Y. ‐., Gu, D. ‐., & Wang, W. ‐.
Affiliations
  • Department of Agricultural Resource and Environment Nanjing University of Science and Technology Nanjing 210044 China
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Nanjing University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • Yangzhou Polytechnic Institute (CN)
  • Huai‐yin Agricultural Research Institute of Jiangsu Huai‐an 223001 China
Venue
Soil Use and Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-01-14
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
220-229
ISSN
  • 0266-0032 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2743
OpenAlex
W2082606397
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Soil Use and Management (publishedVersion)
Funders
Rice University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Disease Management Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Keywords
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum, watermelon wilt, watermelon, long-term monoculture, fallow, soil microbial communities, microbial diversity, actinomycetes, soil bacteria, soil fungi, pathogen inhibition, microcosm

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review