The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mentorship in the health professions: a review
Abstract
Summary: Background: The importance of mentorship within health care training is well recognised. It offers a means to further enhance workforce performance and engagement, promote learning opportunities and encourage multidisciplinary collaboration. There are both career and life benefits associated with mentorship, and it is increasingly recognised as a bidirectional process that benefits both mentors and mentees. Recently, mentoring has been considered an essential step in professional and personal development, particularly in the field of health care. Literature: This article provides a review of the recent literature to assist those considering the implementation of mentorship programmes within their institutions. Discussion includes topics relating to the key elements of effective mentorship, the various phases and styles of mentorship, the need for career‐long mentoring, ethical issues and potential difficulties in mentorship. Take‐home message: Learning within the workplace includes the development of knowledge and skills, and an understanding of the values important to the profession and the culture of organisations. Within health care training, organisations may encompass hospitals, universities, training organisations and regulatory bodies. The practice of mentorship may help to foster an understanding of the enduring elements of practice within these organisations. Mentoring involves both a coaching and an educational role, requiring a generosity of time, empathy, a willingness to share knowledge and skills, and an enthusiasm for teaching and the success of others. Being mentored is believed to have an important influence on personal development, career guidance and career choice. Ethical issues and potential difficulties in mentorship include conflict of interest, imbalance of power and unrealistic expectations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mentoring in Academic Medicine: A Systematic Review
Sambunjak, D., Straus, S. E., & Marušić, A. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.296.9.1103 · Cited by 1,689
Straus, S. E., Johnson, M. O., Marquez, C., & Feldman, M. D. (2012) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e31827647a0 · Cited by 608
Issues in the Mentor–Mentee Relationship in Academic Medicine: A Qualitative Study
Straus, S. E., Chatur, F., & Taylor, M. (2009) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e31819301ab · Cited by 371
Mentoring faculty in academic medicine: A new paradigm?
Pololi, L., & Knight, S. (2005) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.05007.x · Cited by 300
Feldman, M. D., Arean, P. A., Marshall, S. J., Lovett, M., & O'Sullivan, P. (2010) · Medical Education Online · doi:10.3402/meo.v15i0.5063 · Cited by 286
Entering and navigating academic medicine: academic clinician-educators’ experiences
Kumar, K., Roberts, C., & Thistlethwaite, J. (2011) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03887.x · Cited by 93
Dutta, R., Hawkes, S. L., Kuipers, E., Guest, D. E., Fear, N. T., & Iversen, A. C. (2011) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/1472-6920-11-13 · Cited by 72
Mentorship: excellence in the mundane
Fulton, J. A. (2013) · British Journal of Healthcare Assistants · doi:10.12968/bjha.2013.7.3.142 · Cited by 20
Coaching early‐career educators in the health professions
Yoon, M. H., El‐Haddad, C., Durning, S. J., et al. (2016) · The Clinical Teacher · doi:10.1111/tct.12568 · Cited by 18
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Ridout S, 2006, Mentoring: guided by the light, PT Magazine, 14, 42
- 10.1002/9781119180449 · doi:10.1002/9781119180449
- Straus SE, 2014, Mentorship in academic medicine
- Abiddin NZ, 2006, Mentoring and Coaching: The Roles and Practices, The Journal of Human Resources and Adult Learning, 107
- 10.1080/J003v20n01_01 · doi:10.1080/j003v20n01_01
- Kilgallon K, 2012, Mentoring in Nursing and Healthcare: A Practical Approach
- 10.1136/bmj.332.7535.s38 · doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7535.s38
- 10.1136/pgmj.2006.054155 · doi:10.1136/pgmj.2006.054155
- 10.1177/1523422305279689 · doi:10.1177/1523422305279689
Cited by
Wu, J., & Olagunju, A. T. (2024) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-024-06248-7 · Cited by 27
Learning medical professionalism – the application of appreciative inquiry and social media
Hsieh, J.-G., Kuo, L.-C., & Wang, Y.-W. (2019) · Medical Education Online · doi:10.1080/10872981.2019.1586507 · Cited by 25
Kwong, S.-Y. P., Yu, S.-R., Liao, K.-C., Liao, S.-C., Hsiao, C.-T., & Chaou, C.-H. (2025) · Perspectives on Medical Education · doi:10.5334/pme.1499 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Burgess, A., van Diggele, C., & Mellis, C.
- Venue
- The Clinical Teacher
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-01-10
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 197-202
- ISSN
- 1743-4971 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-498X
- OpenAlex
- W2783672134
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 29.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mentorship in the health professions: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/tct.12756
- The paper
- Burgess, A., van Diggele, C., & Mellis, C. (2018). Mentorship in the health professions: a review. The Clinical Teacher. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12756
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.