Shifting Interprofessional Education Pedagogies: Lessons and Implications for Africa
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: Although several theoretical guidelines and evaluations exist for IPE programme development and implementation, practical expert insights remain invaluable. For best practices, guiding future programme design and improving IPE implementation, we aimed to explore the perspectives of 15 international experts on the development and implementation of IPE programmes, including the challenges encountered. Methodology: A qualitative exploratory descriptive design was used. Fifteen international IPE experts were purposively sampled and individually interviewed using a semistructured interview guide incorporating the key areas of IPE programme development and implementation. Data were analysed using thematic content analysis. Results: Four themes were identified. Themes include IPE structure in higher education institutions; faculty and student involvement; challenges and opportunities; and evaluation and quality improvements in IPE programmes. International experts prioritised classroom‐based learning, whereas Southern African experts underscored community‐based IPE. IPE‐related challenges revolve around institutional culture, resources, saturated curricula and professional hierarchies, including compulsory IPE inclusion requirements. Yet, these were overcome by opportunities to design innovative IPE programmes while fostering IPE scholarships and research funding. Conclusion: IPE is gaining international recognition despite common, yet distinct, challenges and opportunities. Classroom‐centric IPE models from HICs are challenged by digital storytelling, home visits and local community collaborations. We found that hierarchies and rigid curricula presented greater challenges than resource constraints. IPE integration in LMICs and underprivileged areas is indeed a transformative strategy for innovation and positive healthcare outcomes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
S., N. L. (2017) · doi:10.1177/1609406917733847 · Cited by 14,051 · see citing works
Lapkin, S., Levett-Jones, T., & Gilligan, C. (2013) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2011.11.006 · Cited by 382 · see citing works
Sunguya, B. F., Hinthong, W., Jimba, M., & Yasuoka, J. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096724 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Delawala, F., Heymans, Y., & Christmals, C. D.
- Affiliations
- North-West University (ZA)
- Corresponding author
- Delawala, Farhin
- Venue
- The Clinical Teacher
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2025-08-25
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e70189-e70189
- ISSN
- 1743-4971 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-498X
- PMC
- PMC12378144
- OpenAlex
- W4413727787
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 1.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Clinical Teacher (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
- Keywords
- interprofessional education, expert opinion, classroom learning, institutional culture, curriculum integration, professional hierarchy, low- and middle-income countries, Africa, Southern Africa
- MeSH terms
- Interprofessional Education, Africa, Curriculum, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Program Development, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review