Cited by 22Retinal Imaging and AnalysisRetinal Diseases and TreatmentsOphthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies

Diabetic retinopathy screening programme utilising non‐mydriatic fundus imaging in slum populations of New Delhi, India

Open access
Wadhwani, Meenakshi, Vashist, Praveen, Singh, Suraj Senjam, Gupta, Noopur, Malhotra, Sumit, Gupta, Aparna, Shukla, Pallavi, Bhardwaj, Amit +1 more·2018·Tropical Medicine & International Health

Abstract

Objectives: To develop and implement a community‐based programme for screening of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in urban populations of Delhi. Methods: Known diabetics (KD s) aged 40 years and older were identified through house‐to‐house surveys, volunteers and publicity. All KD s were referred to DR screening camps organised locally where procedures included brief medical history, ocular examination and non‐mydriatic fundus photography using portable handheld camera. Fundal images were graded on the spot by trained optometrists for DR. Patients with DR were referred to tertiary centre for management. Results: A total of 11 566 KD s were identified, of whom 9435 (81.6%) visited DR screening camps and 8432 (89.4%) had DR gradable images. DR was identified in 13.5% of subjects; 351 cases were mild NPDR, 567 moderate, 92 severe. Seventy‐seven had PDR, and 49 had DME, and 2.7% of participants were blind (presenting visual acuity <3/60 in better eye). Non‐use of lifestyle management, presence of systemic complications, BMI <18.5 kg/m 2, disease duration of >5 years and uncontrolled diabetes were associated with increased odds of DR. All cases with DR were referred, and 420 (37%) successful referrals to base hospital were observed. Conclusion: The programme of creating awareness about DR, identifying KD s and optometrist‐led DR screening using non‐mydriatic fundus camera based in slums was successful.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/tmi.13039

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mydriasis was employed in 17 out of 30 studies, while the remainder used non-mydriatic techniques when clinically appropriate.

    “Mydriasis was employed in 17/30 studies, while the remainder used non-mydriatic techniques when clinically appropriate [9, 12, 18, 22, 24, 27, 33, 35, 36].”
  • The International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy severity scale was the most commonly utilized severity scale, used in 15 out of 30 studies.

    “Various severity scales are used to classify diabetic retinopathy (DR), with the International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy (ICDR) severity scale being the most commonly utilized in 15 out of 30 studies [9, 11–13, 15, 18, 21–23, 32, 34–36].”
  • Remote grading of retinal images was widely utilized, with 18 out of 30 studies relying on this approach.

    “Remote grading of retinal images is widely utilized, with 18 out of 30 studies relying on this approach [10, 15, 16, 18, 21–27, 29–35, 37]”
  • The predominant method for managing remotely graded images was store and forward (14 out of 30 studies), with seven studies adopting real-time processing.

    “The predominant method for managing these remotely graded images is ‘store and forward’ (14 out of 30 studies) [15, 16, 18, 22–24, 26–30, 33, 35, 37], with seven studies adopting the ‘real-time’ processing method [8, 10, 11, 25, 31, 32, 34]”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wadhwani, M., Vashist, P., Singh, S. S., Gupta, N., Malhotra, S., Gupta, A., Shukla, P., Bhardwaj, A., & Gupta, V.
Affiliations
All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Corresponding author
Gupta, Vivek
Venue
Tropical Medicine & International Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-03
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
405-414
ISSN
  • 1360-2276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3156
OpenAlex
W2791834572
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Tropical Medicine & International Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Keywords
diabetic retinopathy, diabetic retinopathy screening, non-mydriatic fundus photography, handheld camera, community-based screening, slum population, New Delhi, diabetic macular edema, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, risk factors, tertiary care referral, diabetes awareness
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Blindness, Cities, Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetic Retinopathy, Female, Fundus Oculi, Humans, India, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Mydriatics, Photography, Poverty, Poverty Areas, Referral and Consultation, Retina, Risk Factors, Urban Population, Visual Acuity, Body Mass Index, Disease Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review