Cited by 18Cellular transport and secretionPancreatic function and diabetesExtracellular vesicles in disease

PtdIns(4,5)P2 is not required for secretory granule docking

Omar‐Hmeadi, Muhmmad, Gandasi, Nikhil R., Barg, Sebastian·2018·Traffic

Abstract

Phosphoinositides (PtdIns) play important roles in exocytosis and are thought to regulate secretory granule docking by co-clustering with the SNARE protein syntaxin to form a docking receptor in the plasma membrane. Here we tested this idea by high-resolution total internal reflection imaging of EGFP-labeled PtdIns markers or syntaxin-1 at secretory granule release sites in live insulin-secreting cells. In intact cells, PtdIns markers distributed evenly across the plasma membrane with no preference for granule docking sites. In contrast, syntaxin-1 was found clustered in the plasma membrane, mostly beneath docked granules. We also observed rapid accumulation of syntaxin-1 at sites where granules arrived to dock. Acute depletion of plasma membrane phosphatidylinositol (4,5) bisphosphate (PtdIns(4,5)P 2 ) by recruitment of a 5'-phosphatase strongly inhibited Ca 2+ -dependent exocytosis, but had no effect on docked granules or the distribution and clustering of syntaxin-1. Cell permeabilization by α-toxin or formaldehyde-fixation caused PtdIns marker to slowly cluster, in part near docked granules. In summary, our data indicate that PtdIns(4,5)P 2 accelerates granule priming, but challenge a role of PtdIns in secretory granule docking or clustering of syntaxin-1 at the release site.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/tra.12562

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is strong evidence for PI(4,5)P2 segregation, but many caveats remain due to technical limitations.

    “Although there is strong evidence to support segregation of PI(4,5)P2, as discussed above, there remains many caveats due to technical limitations [132,133].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Omar‐Hmeadi, M., Gandasi, N. R., & Barg, S.
Affiliations
Uppsala University (SE)
Corresponding author
Barg, Sebastian
Venue
Traffic
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-04-24
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
436-445
ISSN
  • 1398-9219 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0854
OpenAlex
W2792238178
Cited by
18
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Traffic (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Svenska Sällskapet för Medicinsk Forskning
  • Stiftelsen Familjen Ernfors Fond
  • Hjärnfonden
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • Barndiabetesfonden
  • O. E. och Edla Johanssons Vetenskapliga Stiftelse
  • European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
Keywords
phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate, syntaxin-1, exocytosis, insulin secretion, calcium-dependent exocytosis, membrane protein clustering
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Line, Cell Membrane, Exocytosis, Humans, Trypsin, PC12 Cells, Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-Diphosphate, Secretory Vesicles, Cell Line, Tumor, Insulin-Secreting Cells, SNARE Proteins, Syntaxin 1, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review