The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accumulation by urban dispossession: struggles over urban space in Accra, Ghana
Open accessAbstract
This article draws on original empirical research in Accra, Ghana to explore the particular dynamics that contemporary processes of class‐based dispossession assume at the urban scale, posing the concept of ‘accumulation by urban dispossession’. It responds to recent calls to shift the focus of urban theory from North to South and demonstrates how widely used concepts must be interrogated and reworked as they travel from place to place. Accra is home to a large informal proletariat that is excluded from formal wage labour and housing markets and therefore has to create urban commons in order to reproduce itself. Since these commons place limits to capital's ability to valorise the urban fabric, state‐led accumulation by urban dispossession is a strategic response that employs a range of physical‐legal and discursive mechanisms to overcome these limits through the enclosure of the urban commons and the expulsion of the informal poor. This argument problematises Harvey's capital‐centric theory of accumulation by dispossession, which treats enclosure as a fix for capital's inherent crisis tendencies. Furthermore, it demonstrates that primitive accumulation in this context differs from the classic form described by Marx on the grounds that it is based on the expulsion of the dispossessed rather than their incorporation into the capital relation as labour power.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Harvey, D. (2003) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199264315.001.0001 · Cited by 7,037
Capital Accumulation and the State System: Assessing David Harvey's The New Imperialism
Ashman, S., & Callinicos, A. (2006) · Historical Materialism · doi:10.1163/156920606778982572 · Cited by 64
Cited by
Towards a paradigm of Southern urbanism
Schindler, S. (2017) · City · doi:10.1080/13604813.2016.1263494 · Cited by 292
The fire this time: Grenfell, racial capitalism and the urbanisation of empire
Danewid, I. (2020) · European Journal of International Relations · doi:10.1177/1354066119858388 · Cited by 153
Douglas, I. (2018) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.09.025 · Cited by 134
Metadata
- Authors
- Gillespie, T.
- Venue
- Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-10-07
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 66-77
- ISSN
- 0020-2754 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-5661
- OpenAlex
- W2129710368
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 54.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accumulation by urban dispossession: struggles over urban space in Accra, Ghana. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/tran.12105
- The paper
- Gillespie, T. (2016). Accumulation by urban dispossession: struggles over urban space in Accra, Ghana. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.