The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lincosamide resistance is less frequent in Denmark in Staphylococcus pseudintermedius from first‐time canine superficial pyoderma compared with skin isolates from clinical samples with unknown clinical background
Abstract
Background Antimicrobial resistance may be overestimated in bacterial isolates from clinical samples because veterinarians often submit samples in cases of treatment failure or recurrent cases, which are more frequently associated with resistant strains. Hypothesis/objectives To assess to what extent the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolated from first-time superficial pyoderma differs from canine skin isolates from clinical samples with unknown clinical background. Animals Two study groups were enrolled in Denmark between March 2012 and October 2013: 57 dogs with first-time superficial pyoderma and no prior antimicrobial treatment (Group A); and 289 different dogs for which skin specimens were submitted for culture during the study (Group B). Methods One S. pseudintermedius isolate from each dog was confirmed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and tested for antimicrobial susceptibility by broth microdilution. Resistance levels in the two groups were compared by Fisher's exact test. Results Clindamycin resistance was less frequent in Group A (14%) than in Group B (27%) (P = 0.02). Similar trends were observed for amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (1.8 versus 4.8%), chloramphenicol (8.8 versus 14.5%), enrofloxacin (1.8 versus 3.5%), oxacillin (1.8 versus 4.8%) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (3.5 versus 5.9%). Oxacillin resistance was significantly associated with resistance to six of seven non-β-lactams. Conclusions and clinical importanc…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This research group concluded that antimicrobial susceptibility data based on routine diagnostic specimens are generally biased in favor of resistance and are not representative for patients without a history of antimicrobial therapy.”
From Pan-European analysis shows stable, low antimicrobial resistance in most bovine and porcine respiratory tract pathogens (2026) · cites this paper as Larsen et al. (2015)
Citations
Cites
Hillier, A., Lloyd, D. H., Weese, J. S., Blondeau, J. M., Boothe, D. M., Breitschwerdt, E. B., Guardabassi, L., Papich, M. G., Rankin, S. C., Turnidge, J. D., et al. (2014) · Veterinary Dermatology · doi:10.1111/vde.12118 · Cited by 348
Self-citationAntimicrobial Stewardship in Small Animal Veterinary Practice
Guardabassi, L., & Prescott, J. F. (2015) · Veterinary Clinics of North America Small Animal Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cvsm.2014.11.005 · Cited by 158
Self-citationMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius among dogs admitted to a small animal hospital
Nienhoff, U., Kadlec, K., Chaberny, I. F., Verspohl, J., Gerlach, G.-F., Kreienbrock, L., Schwarz, Š., Simón, D., & Nolte, I. J. A. (2010) · Veterinary Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.12.018 · Cited by 119
Antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius
Kadlec, K., & Schwarz, Š. (2012) · Veterinary Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3164.2012.01056.x · Cited by 99
Moodley, A., Damborg, P., & Nielsen, S. S. (2014) · Veterinary Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.02.008 · Cited by 96
Self-citationRantala, M. H. J., Huovinen, P., Hölsö, K., Lilas, A., & Kaartinen, L. (2004) · Veterinary Record · doi:10.1136/vr.155.9.259 · Cited by 87
HOLM, B. R., Petersson, U. A., Mörner, A. P., Bergström, K., Franklin, A., & Greko, C. (2002) · Veterinary Record · doi:10.1136/vr.151.20.600 · Cited by 61
Rantala, M. H. J., Lahti, E. T., Kuhalampi, J., Pesonen, S., Järvinen, A.-K., Saijonmaa‐Koulumies, L. E., & Honkanen‐Buzalski, T. (2004) · Acta veterinaria Scandinavica · doi:10.1186/1751-0147-45-37 · Cited by 60
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), 2008, Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated from Animals
- Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), 2013, Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated from Animals
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What has changed in canine pyoderma? A narrative review
Loeffler, A., & Lloyd, D. H. (2018) · The Veterinary Journal · doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.04.002 · Cited by 142
Mader, R., Damborg, P., Amat, J.-P., Bengtsson, B., Bourély, C., Broens, E. M., Busani, L., Crespo-Robledo, P., Filippitzi, M., Fitzgerald, W., et al. (2021) · Eurosurveillance · doi:10.2807/1560-7917.es.2021.26.4.2001359 · Cited by 96
Self-citationLoeffler, A., Cain, C. L., Ferrer, L., Nishifuji, K., Varjonen, K., Papich, M. G., Guardabassi, L., Frosini, S., Barker, E., & Weese, J. S. (2025) · Veterinary Dermatology · doi:10.1111/vde.13342 · Cited by 69
Self-citationLudwig, C., de Jong, A., Moyaert, H., Garch, F. E., Janes, R., Klein, U., Morrissey, I., Thiry, J., & Youala, M. (2016) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/jam.13287 · Cited by 64
Mader, R., Madero, C. M., Aasmäe, B., Bourély, C., Broens, E. M., Busani, L., Callens, B., Collineau, L., Crespo-Robledo, P., Damborg, P., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.838490 · Cited by 53
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Larsen, R., Boysen, L., Berg, J., Guardabassi, L., & Damborg, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Veterinary Dermatology Clinic Rudemarken 37 2840 Holte Denmark
- Corresponding author
- Damborg, Peter
- Venue
- Veterinary Dermatology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-04-18
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 202
- ISSN
- 0959-4493 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3164
- OpenAlex
- W1982093447
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 1.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Veterinary Dermatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Agria och SKKs Forskningsfond for sällskapsdjur (Not applicable)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Microbiology (medical) › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
- Keywords
- Staphylococcus pseudintermedius, lincosamide resistance, clindamycin resistance, antimicrobial resistance prevalence, multidrug resistance, empirical antibiotic therapy, skin isolates, oxacillin resistance, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, dogs
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Denmark, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Pyoderma, Skin, Staphylococcal Skin Infections, Staphylococcus, Prevalence, Drug Resistance, Bacterial, Lincosamides
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
