Cited by 52Health Sciences Research and EducationNursing education and managementHealth Education and Validation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Psychometric Analysis of Two New Scales: The Evidence‐Based Practice Nursing Leadership and Work Environment Scales

Pryse, Yvette, McDaniel, Anna, Schafer, John·2014·Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing

Abstract

Background Those in nursing have been charged with practicing to the full extent of their education and training by the Institute of Medicine. Therefore, evidence-based practice (EBP) has never been more important to nursing than in the current healthcare environment. Frequently the burden of EBP is the responsibility of the bedside practitioner, but has been found to be a process that requires leadership and organizational support. A key underlying component of a strong EBP environment includes effective communications and collaboration among staff and nursing leadership. Aims Developing measurement tools that examine the milieu and nursing leadership in which the staff nurse practices is an important component of understanding the factors that support or hinder EBP. The aim of this study is to report on the development and analysis of two new scales designed to explore leadership and organizational support for EBP. The EBP Nursing Leadership Scale (10 items) examines the staff nurses perception of support provided by the nurse manager for EBP, and the EBP Work Environment Scale (8 items) examines organizational support for EBP. Methods Staff nurses who worked at least .5 FTE in direct patient care, from two inner city hospitals (n = 422) completed the scales. The scales were evaluated for internal consistency reliability with the Cronbach alpha technique, content validity using a panel of experts, and construct validity by Results The content validity index computed from ex…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/wvn.12045

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Communication skills are essential to nurse manager competence.

    “Communication skills are vital to the competence of nurse managers (Choi et al., 2018 ;Meissner & Radford, 2015 ;Pryse et al., 2014 ;and Wagner et al., 2015 ).”

    From Nurse manager communication and outcomes for nursing: An integrative review. (2021) · cites this paper as Pryse et al., 2014

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. 10.1037/a0019188 · DOI · Paper page
  2. American Nurses Credentialing Center., 2011, The Magnet Model Components and Sources of Evidence. Magnet Recognition Program (2nd ed.)
  3. 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2006.00486.x · DOI
  4. 10.1097/01.NNR.0000280629.63654.95 · DOI
  5. 10.1097/01.NNR.0000280635.71278.e9 · DOI
  6. 10.1097/01.NNR.0000280637.24644.fd · DOI
  7. Field A. P., 2005, Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd ed.)
  8. 10.1002/14651858.CD002212 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/S0897-1897(05)80052-7 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Gale V., 2009, Organizational readiness for evidence‐based practice, Journal of Nursing Management, 39, 91
  11. 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2004.00454.x · DOI
  12. 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2007.00095.x · DOI
  13. 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2008.00860.x · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2007.00770.x · DOI
  15. 10.1097/00005110-200607000-00011 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/s10488-007-0143-x · DOI
  17. 10.1097/00005110-200009000-00008 · DOI
  18. 10.1097/01.HMR.0000296785.29718.5d · DOI
  19. 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2007.00775.x · DOI
  21. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02150.x · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2008.00130.x · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1111/wvn.12032 · DOI
  24. Melnyk B., 2005, Evidence‐based practice in nursing and healthcare
  25. 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2008.00126.x · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.outlook.2010.06.002 · DOI
  27. 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2007.00075.x · DOI
  28. 10.1111/j.1365-2934.2005.00600.x · DOI
  29. Pedhazur E. J., 1991, Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Approach
  30. 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2007.00106.x · DOI
  31. 10.1002/nur.20199 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2008.00859.x · DOI
  33. 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2008.00111.x · DOI
  34. 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2011.00216.x · DOI
  35. 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02588.x · DOI
  36. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04044.x · DOI
  37. 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2009.00467.x · DOI
  38. Tabachnick B. G., 2012, Using Multivariate Statistics
  39. 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000277823.51806.10 · DOI
  40. 10.1097/01.HMR.0000296785.29718.5d · DOI
  41. 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2011.00225.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pryse, Y., McDaniel, A., & Schafer, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • University of Florida Health (US)
Corresponding author
Pryse, Yvette
Venue
Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-07
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
240-247
ISSN
  • 1545-102X (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-6787
OpenAlex
W1564108341
Cited by
52
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
FWCI
4.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
NIOSH ERC Pilot Research Project Training Program (#T42/OH008432-05.)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
evidence-based practice, nursing leadership, work environment, organizational support, nurse managers, scale development, psychometric validation, staff nurses, inner-city hospital
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Communication, Cooperative Behavior, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Hospitals, Teaching, Hospitals, University, Hospitals, Urban, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Leadership, Male, Middle Aged, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Environment, United States, Reproducibility of Results, Organizational Culture, Workplace, Evidence-Based Nursing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review