Cited by 1Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlVagus Nerve Stimulation Research

Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on heart rate variability: a systematic review protocol

Dias, Ingrid Alves, Hazime, Fuad Ahmad, Lopes, Danilo Alves, Silva, Cristiano Sales da, Baptista, Abrahão Fontes, Silva, Baldomero Antonio Kato da·2019·JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to synthesize the available evidence on the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on heart rate modulation, indexed by heart rate variability parameters in healthy individuals and those with clinical disorders. INTRODUCTION: There is some evidence that altered heart rate variability parameters are associated with different clinical disorders. For example, diminished parasympathetic activity has been explored as a potential biomarker for some chronic pain conditions. Considering the dynamic interaction between brain and heart, neuromodulatory strategies targeting this relationship could exert a positive influence on the cardiac autonomic system. Transcranial direct current stimulation is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique that has been presenting recent advances in the treatment of various clinical disorders. However, the evidence concerning transcranial direct current stimulation application focusing on brain-heart interaction is still controversial. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This review will consider studies that investigate the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on heart rate variability in healthy participants or those with clinical disorders. METHODS: This review will follow JBI systematic review methodology recommendations. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycNET, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL) and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) will be searched, along with several sources of gray literature. Retrieval of full-text studies, and assessment of methodological quality and data extraction, will be performed independently by two reviewers. Data will be pooled in statistical meta-analysis, where possible. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42018114105.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.11124/jbisrir-d-19-00134

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Dias, I. A., Hazime, F. A., Lopes, D. A., Silva, C. S. D., Baptista, A. F., & Silva, B. A. K. D.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal do Piauí (BR)
  • Universidade Federal do ABC (BR)
Corresponding author
Dias, Ingrid Alves
Venue
JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports
Published
2019-11-26
Volume
Publish Ahead of Print
Issue
6
Pages
1313-1319
ISSN
2202-4433 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2990531917
Cited by
1
References
3
Citations by year
2022: 1
FWCI
0.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
Keywords
transcranial direct current stimulation, heart rate variability, heart-brain interaction, parasympathetic activity, neuromodulation, chronic pain, non-invasive brain stimulation
MeSH terms
Systematic Reviews as Topic, Brain, Heart Rate, Humans, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Chronic Pain, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review