The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
Reconstructing Bodies: Biomedicine, Health, and Nation-Building in South Korea Since 1945
Abstract
This book surveys the transformation of medical practice in Korea from the late 19th century to the present, detailing the numerous changes involved as late Choson Korea (1876-1910) gave way to Japanese colonization (1910-1945), the post-war American Occupation (1945-1948), and an independent Republic of Korea (ROK) (1948- ), with the Korean War soon to come. Moreover, the book focuses on the corresponding history of medical intervention—sanitary, surgical, and preventive public health—by a wide array of private, university-based, and state-led actors, emphasizing that the so-called “Miracle of the Han,” the mythic rise of the South Korean economy from the mid-1960s, was accompanied by a parallel effort to measure, understand, and ultimately reshape the bodies of Koreans to create a new type of citizen, thereby binding that individual to the state though biomedical practice. These forms of intervention would include large-scale public health efforts directed at specific diseases—tuberculosis, leprosy, intestinal parasites—along with related state-directed campaigns of the 1960s, especially Family Planning. Ultimately, the book argues that the newly redefined relationship between the individual, the body, and the state, along with marketplace forces and an emerging national health insurance scheme, offers a great deal toward explaining the flexibility with which South Koreans now treat their own bodies, increasingly engaging in a variety of surgical enhancements since the late 1990s in a market framed by the neoliberal rhetoric of choice.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In this textbook, Yi delineated for the first time the four constitutional types that later became what is now considered a distinctly Korean-style of Sasang 四象 (lit., 'Four forms') medicine.$^{2}$^{1}”
From The Anthropology and History of Medicine in Korea (2016) · cites this paper as [21]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Anthropology and History of Medicine in Korea
Hanson, M. (2016) · Asian Medicine · doi:10.1163/15734218-12341383 · Cited by 2
Reconfiguring East Asian Modernity
Flowers, J. (2016) · Asian Medicine · doi:10.1163/15734218-12341379
Metadata
- Authors
- DiMoia, J.
- Corresponding author
- DiMoia, John
- ORCID
- DiMoia, John
- Venue
- Stanford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Stanford University Press
- Published
- 2020-08-19
- OpenAlex
- W4248765995
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 10.84
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Stanford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History of Medicine and Tropical Health
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History of Science and Medicine
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medical History and Research
- Keywords
- history of medicine in Korea, medical practice, public health, leprosy, intestinal parasites, family planning, national health insurance, cosmetic surgery, body modification, neoliberalism, individual choice, South Korean economic development, Korean War, Japanese colonial rule, Chosŏn Korea
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review