Cited by 149Sports Performance and TrainingMuscle Physiology and DisordersMuscle metabolism and nutrition

Age and sex affect human muscle fibre adaptations to heavy-resistance strength training

Martel, Gregory F., Roth, Stephen M., Ivey, Frederick M., Lemmer, Jeffrey T., Tracy, Brian L., Hurlbut, Diane E., Metter, E. Jeffrey, Hurley, Ben F. +1 more·2006·Experimental Physiology

Abstract

This study assessed age and sex effects on muscle fibre adaptations to heavy-resistance strength training (ST). Twenty-two young men and women (20-30 years old) and 18 older men and women (65-75 years old) completed 9 weeks of heavy-resistance knee extension exercises with the dominant leg 3 days week(-1); the non-dominant leg served as a within-subject, untrained control. Bilateral vastus lateralis muscle biopsies were obtained before and after ST for analysis of type I, IIa and IIx muscle fibre cross-sectional area (CSA) and fibre type distribution. One-repetition maximum (1-RM) strength was also assessed before and after ST. ST resulted in increased CSA of type I, IIa and IIx muscle fibres in the trained leg of young men, type I and IIa fibres in young women, type IIa fibres in older men, and type IIx fibres in older women (all P<0.05). Analysis of fibre type distribution revealed a significant increase in the percentage of type I fibres (P<0.05) along with a decrease in type IIx fibres (P=0.054) after ST only in young women. There were no significant changes in muscle fibre CSA or fibre type distribution in the untrained leg for any group. All groups displayed significant increases in 1-RM (27-39%; all P<0.01). In summary, ST led to significant increases in 1-RM and type II fibre CSA in all groups; however, age and sex influence specific muscle fibre subtype responses to ST.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/expphysiol.2005.032771

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 62 · Cited by 149

Authors
Martel, G. F., Roth, S. M., Ivey, F. M., Lemmer, J. T., Tracy, B. L., Hurlbut, D. E., Metter, E. J., Hurley, B. F., & Rogers, M. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland Eastern Shore (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • National Institute on Aging (US)
Venue
Experimental Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-01-30
Volume
91
Issue
2
Pages
457-464
ISSN
  • 0958-0670 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-445X
OpenAlex
W2128116691
Cited by
149
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
  • National Institute on Aging (1AG-42148)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
age effects, sex differences, muscle fiber cross-sectional area, fiber type distribution, type I muscle fibers, type IIA fibers, one-repetition maximum, knee extension, vastus lateralis, older adults, young adults
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Female, Humans, Hypertrophy, Leg, Male, Muscle Contraction, Sex Factors, Exercise, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Fibers, Fast-Twitch, Muscle Fibers, Slow-Twitch

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review