Animal Research: Reporting In Vivo Experiments: The ARRIVE guidelines
Open accessAbstract
The NC3Rs gratefully acknowledges the expertise and advice that all the contributors have given to developing the guidelines. We would particularly like to acknowledge the contribution of the NC3Rs Reporting Guidelines Working Group†– Professor Doug Altman, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford UK, Professor David Balding, Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, Imperial College, London UK, Professor William Browne, Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol UK, Professor Innes Cuthill, School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol UK, Dr Colin Dunn, Editor Laboratory Animals (Royal Society of Medicine Press), Dr Michael Emerson, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London UK, Dr Stella Hurtley, Senior Editor Science, Professor Ian McGrath, Editor-in-Chief British Journal of Pharmacology (Wiley Blackwell Publishers) and Dr Clare Stanford, Department of Psychopharmacology, University College, London UK. We would also like to thank NC3Rs grant holders, the Medical Research Council, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), Wellcome Trust, Parkinson's Disease Society, British Heart Foundation and their grant holders and funding committee members who provided feedback on the guidelines; and Kathryn Chapman and Vicky Robinson (both NC3Rs) for their help with the manuscript. †Please note: that the working group members who contributed to these guidelines were advising in their personal capacity and their input does not necessarily represent the policy of the organisations they are associated with. The reporting guidelines project was funded by the National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs). These guidelines are excerpted (as permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution License [CCAL], with the knowledge and approval of PLoS Biology and the authors) from Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research. PLoS Biol 2010; 8(6): e1000412. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000412. These guidelines are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The ARRIVE guidelines were originally developed in 2010 to improve the reporting of animal research.
“The ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) were originally developed in 2010 to improve the reporting of animal research.”
From The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research (2020) · cites this paper as [26]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research
Percie du Sert, N., Hurst, V., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., Browne, W. J., Clark, A., Cuthill, I. C., Dirnagl, U., et al. (2020) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410 · Cited by 5,939 · see citing works
Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research
Kilkenny, C., Browne, W. J., Cuthill, I. C., Emerson, M., & Altman, D. G. (2012) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1016/j.joca.2012.02.010 · Cited by 728 · see citing works
Pamies, D., Ekert, J., Zurich, M.-G., Frey, O., Werner, S., Piergiovanni, M., Freedman, B. S., Keong Teo, A. K., Erfurth, H., Reyes, D. R., et al. (2024) · Stem Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2024.03.009 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
- Venue
- Experimental Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-07-09
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 842-844
- ISSN
- 0958-0670 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-445X
- OpenAlex
- W4255738759
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Experimental Physiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- British Heart Foundation
- Parkinson's UK
- Imperial College London
- University of Oxford
- National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research
- University of Bristol
- Directorate for Biological Sciences
- Medical Research Council
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Keywords
- ARRIVE guidelines, animal research reporting, in vivo experiments, reporting quality, animal welfare, reporting guidelines
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animal Husbandry, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Periodicals as Topic, Publishing, Quality Control, Research Design, Animal Experimentation, Checklist
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review