Cited by 155Pancreatic function and diabetesConnexins and lens biologyDiabetes Treatment and Management

δ‐cells and β‐cells are electrically coupled and regulate α‐cell activity via somatostatin

Open access
Briant, L. J. B., Reinbothe, T. M., Spiliotis, I., Miranda, C., Rodriguez, B., Rorsman, P.·2018·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

Key points: We used a mouse expressing a light‐sensitive ion channel in β‐cells to understand how α‐cell activity is regulated by β‐cells. Light activation of β‐cells triggered a suppression of α‐cell activity via gap junction‐dependent activation of δ‐cells. Mathematical modelling of human islets suggests that 23% of the inhibitory effect of glucose on glucagon secretion is mediated by β‐cells via gap junction‐dependent activation of δ‐cells/somatostatin secretion. Glucagon, the body's principal hyperglycaemic hormone, is released from α‐cells of the pancreatic islet. Secretion of this hormone is dysregulated in type 2 diabetes mellitus but the mechanisms controlling secretion are not well understood. Regulation of glucagon secretion by factors secreted by neighbouring β‐ and δ‐cells (paracrine regulation) have been proposed to be important. In this study, we explored the importance of paracrine regulation by using an optogenetic strategy. Specific light‐induced activation of β‐cells in mouse islets expressing the light‐gated channelrhodopsin‐2 resulted in stimulation of electrical activity in δ‐cells but suppression of α‐cell activity. Activation of the δ‐cells was rapid and sensitive to the gap junction inhibitor carbenoxolone, whereas the effect on electrical activity in α‐cells was blocked by CYN 154806, an antagonist of the somatostatin‐2 receptor. These observations indicate that optogenetic activation of the β‐cells propagates to the δ‐cells via gap junctions, and the consequential stimulation of somatostatin secretion inhibits α‐cell electrical activity by a paracrine mechanism. To explore whether this pathway is important for regulating α‐cell activity and glucagon secretion in human islets, we constructed computational models of human islets. These models had detailed architectures based on human islets and consisted of a collection of >500 α‐, β‐ and δ‐cells. Simulations of these models revealed that this gap junctional/paracrine mechanism accounts for up to 23% of the suppression of glucagon secretion by high glucose.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jp274581

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pancreatic β-cells and δ-cells are electrically coupled.

    “Pancreatic β-cells and δ-cells are electrically coupled14.”
  • δ-cells are normally electrically silenced by neighboring β-cells at low glucose, independent of diffusible paracrine factors.

    “In other words, δ-cells are normally electrically silenced by neighboring β-cells at low glucose, independent of diffusible paracrine factors ( Briant et al., 2018 ; Miranda et al., 2022 ).”
  • Mathematical modeling of δ-cells suggests that hyperpolarizing membrane currents spread from β-cells to δ-cells via gap junction connections under low glucose conditions (≤3.9 mmol/L), suppressing δ-cell activity and SST release.

    “Mathematical modeling of δ-cells suggests that hyperpolarizing (inhibitory) membrane currents spread from β-cells to δ-cells via gap junction connections under low glucose conditions (≤3.9 mmol/L), in turn, suppressing δ-cell activity and SST release ( Briant et al., 2018 ; Miranda et al., 2022 ).”
  • The removal of inhibitory SST signals from the paracrine environment at low glucose may favor the activation of neighboring α-cells and consequent glucagon release.

    “The removal of inhibitory SST signals from the paracrine environment at low glucose may favor the activation of neighboring α-cells and consequent glucagon release ( Briant et al., 2018 ; Miranda et al., 2022 ).”
  • Release of the hyperpolarizing brake in conditions of β-cell death, like diabetes, is expected to increase the electrical excitability of the δ-cell and resulting SST output above normal.

    “Release of this hyperpolarizing ‘brake’ in conditions of β-cell death, like diabetes, is expected to increase the electrical excitability of the δ-cell and resulting SST output above normal ( Briant et al., 2018 ; Miranda et al., 2022 ; Singh et al., 2022 ).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 95 · Cited by 155

Authors
Briant, L. J. B., Reinbothe, T. M., Spiliotis, I., Miranda, C., Rodriguez, B., & Rorsman, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • Department of Computer Science University of Oxford Oxford OX1 3QD UK
Corresponding author
Briant, L. J. B.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-11-02
Volume
596
Issue
2
Pages
197-215
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2757711168
Cited by
155
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 1
FWCI
16.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (675451)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/K503769/1)
  • National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC/P001076/1)
  • British Heart Foundation (RE/13/1/30181)
  • Stiftelserna Wilhelm och Martina Lundgrens
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • Wellcome Trust (100246/Z/12/Z, 201325/Z/16/Z, 884655, 089795, 095531)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Connexins and lens biology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
glucagon secretion, alpha cells, pancreatic beta cells, delta cells, somatostatin, electrical coupling, paracrine regulation, optogenetics, channelrhodopsin-2, carbenoxolone, type 2 diabetes
MeSH terms
Animals, Calcium, Cell Communication, Cells, Cultured, Computer Simulation, Female, Glucose, Insulin, Male, Somatostatin, Gap Junctions, Somatostatin-Secreting Cells, Glucagon-Secreting Cells, Insulin-Secreting Cells, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review