The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Anomalous rectification in the metacerebral giant cells and its consequences for synaptic transmission
Open accessAbstract
1. In the central neurones that have so far been examined the passive electrical properties of the extrasynaptic membrane has been shown to be relatively constant in the subthreshold range. Consequently, excitatory synaptic potentials produced by chemical transmission tend to vary in amplitude with changes in membrane potential, decreasing with depolarization and increasing with hyperpolarization. 2. In the two symmetrical giant cells of the ventral metacerebrum of the snail, the EPSPs failed to show the expected alterations in amplitude with changes in membrane potential. Near the resting level the EPSP increased slightly with membrane depolarization and decreased slightly with hyperpolarization. 3. These paradoxical results were not attributable to a change in transmitter release since similar results were obtained when ACh, the putative transmitter, was released iontophoretically on to the cell membrane by means of an extracellular pipette. 4. Measurement of the current—voltage relation of the extrasynaptic membrane revealed two types of rectifying conductance changes. The first, an increase in conductance with depolarization, was turned on at a depolarization of about 15 mV. Its conductance change was similar to the delayed rectification familiar from studies of peripheral nerve and muscle. The second occurred on either side of the resting level, from about 15 mV hyperpolarization to about 10 mV depolarization, and manifested itself as a decrease in conductance with depolarization and an increase with hyperpolarization. By analogy to a similar phenomenon known to occur in skeletal muscle this second rectification has been termed anomalous rectification. 5. The average resistance at 25 mV hyperpolarization was 2·3 × 10 6 Ω, while at 10 mV depolarization it was 2·1 × 10 7 Ω, yielding an average rectification ratio of 10 for the anomalous conductance change. 6. The anomalous rectifying conductance seems to account for the paradoxical behaviour of the EPSP and ACh response to changes in membrane potential. Moreover, the finding that the sharpest change in the anomalous rectification curve occurred on either side of the resting level suggests that this rectification is functionally important as a postsynaptic determinant of synaptic efficacy. Several additional lines of evidence in support of this suggestion have been obtained.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Diversity and ubiquity of K channels
Rudy, B. (1988) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(88)90033-4 · Cited by 1,312
Excitatory synaptic interactions between CA3 neurones in the guinea‐pig hippocampus.
Miles, R., & Wong, R. K. (1986) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016055 · Cited by 503
Neural and molecular mechanisms of microcognition in Limax
Watanabe, S., Kirino, Y., & Gelperin, A. (2008) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm920908 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Kandel, E. R., & Tauc, L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1966-03
- Volume
- 183
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 287-304
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2157670684
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anomalous rectification in the metacerebral giant cells and its consequences for synaptic transmission. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007867
- The paper
- Kandel, E. R., & Tauc, L. (1966). Anomalous rectification in the metacerebral giant cells and its consequences for synaptic transmission. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007867
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.