The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Optical quality of the human eye
Open accessAbstract
1. Optical quality of the eye was measured at eight pupil sizes between 1·5 and 6·6 mm diameter by recording the faint light emerging from the eye; this light was reflected from the bright image of a thin line on the fundus. 2. The nature of the fundus reflexion was examined; it was found that the fundus acts very much like a perfect diffuser while retaining polarization. 3. Using the result that the fundus acts like a diffuser, the recorded line images were Fourier analysed to provide modulation transfer functions. These functions indicate an optical quality considerably higher than that found in previous physical studies. 4. Linespread profiles were then derived from the modulation transfer functions. These profiles are 40% narrower than those of previous physical studies for a 3·0 mm pupil. The narrowest profile occurred with a 2·4 mm pupil. 5. Our results demonstrate that physical and psychophysical studies can yield similar estimates of optical quality. The influence of optical factors not common to both techniques is discussed. Evidence for the existence of neural ‘image sharpening’ mechanisms is reviewed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Predictive coding: a fresh view of inhibition in the retina
Srinivasan, M. V., Laughlin, S. B., & Dubs, A. (1982) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1982.0085 · Cited by 1,042
Could information theory provide an ecological theory of sensory processing?
Atick, J. J. (2011) · Network: Computation in Neural Systems · doi:10.3109/0954898x.2011.638888 · Cited by 679
Visual resolution, contrast sensitivity, and the cortical magnification factor
Virsu, V., & Rovamo, J. (1979) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00236818 · Cited by 536
McDougal, D. H., & Gamlin, P. D. (2014) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.c140014 · Cited by 428
Infrared imaging of sub-retinal structures in the human ocular fundus
Elsner, A. E., Burns, S. A., Weiter, J. J., & Delori, F. C. (1996) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(95)00100-e · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- Campbell, F. W., & Gubisch, R. W.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1966-10
- Volume
- 186
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 558-578
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2003198209
- Cited by
- 810
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optical quality of the human eye. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008056
- The paper
- Campbell, F. W., & Gubisch, R. W. (1966). Optical quality of the human eye. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008056
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.