Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 743

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The sensitivity of muscle spindle afferents to small sinusoidal changes of length

Open access
Matthews, P. B. C., Stein, R. B.·1969·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. Nerve impulses were recorded from spindle afferents of the soleus muscle during sinusoidal changes in muscle length at frequencies from 0·03 to 300 c/s. This was done in the decerebrate cat with intact motor outflow and ‘spontaneous’ fusimotor activity. Computer averaging over a number of cycles was used to measure the response, in impulses/sec, at different phases of the cycle. 2. A linear range was described in which the discharges of the endings were approximately sinusoidally modulated, and in which increasing the amplitude of the stretching produced a proportional increase in the response. At 1 c/s the linear range extended up to only about 0·1 mm for primary endings, but was greater than 1 mm for secondary endings. 3. The sensitivity of an ending in its linear range was defined as the amplitude of its response divided by the amplitude of the length change. The sensitivity of both primary and secondary endings increased progressively on increasing the frequency of stretching above 1 c/s. The experimental observations relating the sensitivity to the sinusoidal frequency were fitted over much of the range by a curve given by the vector sum of components proportional to the length and to the velocity of stretching. This curve has two parameters, a sensitivity at low frequencies (S), and a corner frequency (F) at which the length and velocity contributions are equal. The value of F was about 1·5 c/s for both primary and secondary muscle spindle endings. The value of S was very much greater for primary endings (median value 95 impulses/sec/mm) than for secondary endings (median value 7 impulses/sec/mm). The increasing sensitivity of the endings at higher frequencies caused a progressive reduction in the linear range when it was expressed as an amplitude of stretching, but it remained approximately constant when it was expressed as a modulation of the frequency of discharge. 4. The primary endings were also extremely sensitive to maintained changes in length provided they were of sufficiently small amplitude. 5. In the presence of fusimotor activity a high sensitivity of small changes was found over a wide range of muscle lengths. De‐efferented endings had a comparable high sensitivity when the muscle was at or beyond physiological full extension, but not when the muscle was shorter. 6. The results are contrasted with those obtained previously using stretches of large amplitude, and the physiological significance of the high sensitivity of primary endings to small stretches is discussed in relation to the reflex control of movement.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008719

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 743

Metadata

Authors
Matthews, P. B. C., & Stein, R. B.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1969-02
Volume
200
Issue
3
Pages
723-743
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2124366539
Cited by
743
References
0
FWCI
20.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The sensitivity of muscle spindle afferents to small sinusoidal changes of length. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008719
The paper
Matthews, P. B. C., & Stein, R. B. (1969). The sensitivity of muscle spindle afferents to small sinusoidal changes of length. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008719

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.