The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Elastic constants of the human lens capsule
Open accessAbstract
1. A technique is described whereby the elasticity of the human lens capsule has been determined at birth and throughout life. This technique requires three separate determinations: (a) thickness; (b) stress and strain; (c) Poisson's ratio; (a) the capsule was clamped between accurately perforated ground glass plates and its thickness determined by noting the change in depth of focus between Latex spherules adhering to its upper and lower surfaces; (b) the undisturbed capsule was then placed in a specially designed glass distension apparatus and the relationship between volume and pressure recorded when it was distended with isotonic saline. The permeability of the capsule was also measured; (c) in some cases Poisson's ratio was determined by measuring the change of thickness of the capsule and the height to which it rose when distended with isotonic saline at different pressures. An apparatus was designed for this purpose. 2. The average thickness of the anterior capsule increases from birth until about the 60th year but thereafter it decreases slightly. 3. Poisson's ratio was about 0·47 for both cat and human capsule, and no significant variations with age in human capsule could be detected. 4. Corrected volume pressure curves obeyed Hook's law almost to the point of capsule rupture. 5. In childhood Young's Modulus of elasticity is about 6 × 10 7 dyn/cm 2 and decreases to 3 × 10 7 dyn/cm 2 at 60 and 1·5 × 10 7 dyn/cm 2 in extreme old age. 6. The ultimate tensile stress was 2·3 × 10 7 dyn/cm 2 in young capsules and 0·7 × 10 7 dyn/cm 2 in old ones. The maximum percentage elongation was 29 per cent and independent of age. 7. The implications of these findings are discussed in relation to (a) the mechanical properties of the lens capsule; (b) the ageing of the lens capsule and basement membranes; and (c) the decrease in elasticity of the lens capsule as a cause of presbyopia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Passage of Molecules Through Capillary Walls
Pappenheimer, J. R. (1953) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1953.33.3.387 · Cited by 954
Relation of Structure to Function of the Tissues of the Wall of Blood Vessels
Burton, A. C. (1954) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1954.34.4.619 · Cited by 798
Aortic elastic tissue; isolation with use of formic acid and discussion of some of its properties.
Ayer, J. P., Hass, G. M., & De, P. (1958) · PubMed · Cited by 24
Cited by
Glasser, A., & C.W. Campbell, M. (1999) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00283-1 · Cited by 425
Bron, A. J., Vrensen, G. F. J. M., Koretz, J., Maraini, G., & Harding, J. J. (2000) · Ophthalmologica · doi:10.1159/000027475 · Cited by 280
Basement membrane properties and their recapitulation in organ-on-chip applications
Salimbeigi, G., Vrana, N. E., Ghaemmaghami, A. M., Huri, P. Y., & McGuinness, G. B. (2022) · Materials Today Bio · doi:10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100301 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Fisher, R. F.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1969-03
- Volume
- 201
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-19
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2066518963
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Elastic constants of the human lens capsule. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008739
- The paper
- Fisher, R. F. (1969). Elastic constants of the human lens capsule. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008739
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.