The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images
Open accessAbstract
1. It was found that an occipital evoked potential can be elicited in the human by moving a grating pattern without changing the mean light flux entering the eye. Prolonged viewing of a high contrast grating reduces the amplitude of the potential evoked by a low contrast grating. 2. This adaptation to a grating was studied psychophysically by determining the contrast threshold before and after adaptation. There is a temporary fivefold rise in contrast threshold after exposure to a high contrast grating of the same orientation and spatial frequency. 3. By determining the rise of threshold over a range of spatial frequency for a number of adapting frequencies it was found that the threshold elevation is limited to a spectrum of frequencies with a bandwidth of just over an octave at half amplitude, centred on the adapting frequency. 4. The amplitude of the effect and its bandwidth are very similar for adapting spatial frequencies between 3 c/deg. and 14 c/deg. At higher frequencies the bandwidth is slightly narrower. For lower adapting frequencies the peak of the effect stays at 3 c/deg. 5. These and other findings suggest that the human visual system may possess neurones selectively sensitive to spatial frequency and size. The orientational selectivity and the interocular transfer of the adaptation effect implicate the visual cortex as the site of these neurones. 6. This neural system may play an essential preliminary role in the recognition of complex images and generalization for magnification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837 · Cited by 13,680
Cited by
Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells
Field, D. J. (1987) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.4.002379 · Cited by 3,241
Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex
De Valois, R. L., Albrecht, D. G., & Thorell, L. G. (1982) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(82)90113-4 · Cited by 1,489
Eye Smarter than Scientists Believed: Neural Computations in Circuits of the Retina
Gollisch, T., & Meister, M. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.12.009 · Cited by 795
A review of visual memory capacity: Beyond individual items and toward structured representations
Brady, T. F., Konkle, T., & Alvarez, G. A. (2011) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/11.5.4 · Cited by 556
Chung, S., Li, X., & Nelson, S. B. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00659-1 · Cited by 530
Metadata
- Authors
- Blakemore, C., & Campbell, F. W.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1969-07
- Volume
- 203
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 237-260
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2167553001
- Cited by
- 2,030
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 33.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008862
- The paper
- Blakemore, C., & Campbell, F. W. (1969). On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008862
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.