Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 592

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The mechanical properties of cat soleus muscle during controlled lengthening and shortening movements

Open access
Joyce, G. C., Rack, P. M. H., Westbury, D. R.·1969·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. By supplying pulses to different subdivisions of the ventral nerve roots in rotation, it was possible to obtain smooth contractions of cat soleus with low rates of stimulation. 2. After contracting isometrically the muscle was subjected to constant velocity lengthening or shortening movements. 3. During shortening the tension always fell below the isometric value. The fall in tension was usually greatest when low rates of stimulation were used. 4. The effect of lengthening on tension depended on the rate of stimulation. At high rates of stimulation the tension during lengthening always rose above the isometric tension. At lower rates of stimulation (5–15 pulses/sec) the tension rose at the beginning of an extension, but decreased later in the movement to a level that was often less than the isometric tension corresponding to that muscle length. At these stimulus rates the tension during isometric contraction was usually higher than during a sustained movement in either direction. 5. At low rates of stimulation longitudinal vibratory movements of more than 0·1 mm also reduced the tension far below the isometric value, whereas the reduction was quite slight when the rate of stimulation was high. 6. The isometric tension during smooth contractions at low stimulus rates was remarkable in the following respects: it developed rather slowly, it was higher than the tension during or immediately after movements, and it was only slowly regained after movement had ceased. 7. The results are discussed in relation to the sliding filament theory of muscle contraction, which, with certain assumptions, provides an explanation for many of the findings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008924

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 592

Metadata

Authors
Joyce, G. C., Rack, P. M. H., & Westbury, D. R.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1969-10
Volume
204
Issue
2
Pages
461-474
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2009493254
Cited by
592
References
2
FWCI
5.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The mechanical properties of cat soleus muscle during controlled lengthening and shortening movements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008924
The paper
Joyce, G. C., Rack, P. M. H., & Westbury, D. R. (1969). The mechanical properties of cat soleus muscle during controlled lengthening and shortening movements. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008924

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.