The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Physiological and morphological properties of motoneurones in the central nervous system of the leech
Open accessAbstract
1. A number of motor cell bodies have been identified in the segmental ganglia of the ventral nerve cord of the medicinal leech. These motoneurones supply either excitatory or inhibitory innervation to the muscles in the body wall. 2. Several tests were made to establish that each of the identified motoneurones directly innervates muscle fibres. (a) By injecting a fluorescent dye into the cell bodies of motoneurones, their axons were traced through one or both contralateral roots. (b) Electrical stimulation of a motoneurone by an intracellular electrode caused a single nerve impulse to travel through the roots to the muscles where it set up an excitatory or an inhibitory junctional potential. (c) Impulses set up in the roots were conducted antidromically to the cell body. (d) If the preparation was bathed in 20 m M‐Mg 2+, which blocks chemical synapses, conduction from the cell body to the muscles was not interrupted. Thus it is unlikely that an interneurone was interposed in the pathway within the ganglion. 3. Fourteen pairs of excitatory cells and three pairs of inhibitory cells can be identified in each of the twenty‐one segmental ganglia. These neurones together supply the five different muscle layers in each segment which execute the movements of the leech. Each neurone innervates a territory of muscle fibres which has a consistent size and location from segment to segment. Several lines of evidence suggest that the identified cells form a major fraction of the total number of excitatory motoneurones in the ganglion. 4. The territories of the motoneurones are arranged in a quilt‐like pattern closely resembling that already found for the receptive fields of sensory cells on the skin. Within the longitudinal muscle sheet, individual cells supply narrow or wide strips. The firing of each cell thus could produce bending of the segment in various directions or symmetrical shortening of it, depending on which of the motoneurones were active. 5. It is possible to deduce which motoneurones are firing to produce a particular movement of the animal. Thus these experiments provide a basis for studying reflex integration between motoneurones and the identified mechanosensory cells in the ganglion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The neural circuit for touch sensitivity in Caenorhabditis elegans
Chalfie, M., Sulston, J., White, J., Southgate, E., Thomson, J., & Brenner, S. (1985) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.05-04-00956.1985 · Cited by 1,093
Presynaptic Facilitation as a Mechanism for Behavioral Sensitization in Aplysia
Castellucci, V., & Kandel, E. R. (1976) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.11560 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Stuart, A. E.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1970-08
- Volume
- 209
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 627-646
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2107650772
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physiological and morphological properties of motoneurones in the central nervous system of the leech. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009183
- The paper
- Stuart, A. E. (1970). Physiological and morphological properties of motoneurones in the central nervous system of the leech. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009183
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.